Exploring Neurosurgery Techniques for Enhancing Brain Thing Functions in General Populations and Other Area Matters: A Narrative Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61919/mct22502Keywords:
Functional Neurosurgery, Deep Brain Stimulation, Neuromodulation, Cognitive Enhancement, Network Connectivity, Narrative Review.Abstract
Background: The field of neurosurgery is evolving from a discipline focused on structural correction to one capable of directly modulating brain function. This progression prompts a fundamental question: are the functional outcomes of these interventions a result of specific neuromodulation or a consequence of the physical surgical act itself? Objective: This narrative review aims to critically examine the existing literature to determine whether contemporary neurosurgical techniques enhance brain function through a primarily "neuro" mechanism, a "surgical" mechanism, or a synergistic interplay of both. Main Discussion Points: The review synthesizes evidence across key themes, including the circuit-level modulation achieved by deep brain stimulation for neuropsychiatric disorders, the cognitive consequences of surgical disconnection in ablative procedures, and the emergent network reorganization following resective surgery for epilepsy. The analysis highlights that while advanced techniques demonstrate targeted neurophysiological effects, the evidence is often constrained by methodological limitations such as small sample sizes and a lack of controlled trials. The discussion also explores the implications of these findings for potential cognitive enhancement beyond severe pathology. Conclusion: The evidence suggests that the most significant functional outcomes arise from a synergistic model where the surgical procedure enables precise, targeted neuromodulation, rendering the "neuro" and "surgical" components inseparable. Future progress hinges on larger, mechanistic studies employing standardized outcome measures to fully elucidate these interactions and guide the ethical application of these powerful interventions.
References
1. Herculano-Houzel S. The human brain in numbers: a linearly scaled-up primate brain. Front Hum Neurosci. 2009;3:31.
2. GBD 2019 Neurology Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of disorders affecting the nervous system, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Neurol. 2024;23(4):344-381.
3. Lozano AM, Lipsman N, Bergman H, et al. Deep brain stimulation: current challenges and future directions. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15(3):148-160.
4. Horn A, Wenzel G, Irmen F, et al. Deep brain stimulation induced normalization of the human functional connectome in Parkinson's disease. Brain. 2019;142(10):3129-3143.
5. Scangos KW, Khambhati AN, Daly PM, et al. Closed-loop neuromodulation in an individual with treatment-resistant depression. Nat Med. 2021;27(10):1696-1700.
6. de Haan S, Rietveld E, Stokhof M, Denys D. Effects of deep brain stimulation on the lived experience of obsessive-compulsive disorder patients: in-depth interviews with 18 patients. PloS one. 2015 Aug 27;10(8):e0135524.
7. Riva-Posse P, Choi KS, Holtzheimer PE, Crowell AL, Garlow SJ, Rajendra JK, et al. A connectomic approach for subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation surgery: prospective targeting in treatment-resistant depression. Mol Psychiatry. 2023 Jan;28(1):341-350.
8. Zhan S, Liu W, Li D, Pan S, Pan Y, Li Y, Lin G, Sun B. Long-term follow-up of bilateral anterior capsulotomy in patients with refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder. Clinical neurology and neurosurgery. 2014 Apr 1;119:91-5.
9. Luyten L, Hendrickx S, Raymaekers S, Gabriëls L, Nuttin B. Electrical stimulation in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis alleviates severe obsessive-compulsive disorder. Molecular psychiatry. 2016 Sep;21(9):1272-80.
10. He X, Doucet GE, Pustina D, Sperling MR, Sharan AD, Tracy JI. Presurgical thalamic "hubness" predicts surgical outcome in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology. 2017 May 2;88(22):2106-2113.
11. Fu C, Aisikaer A, Chen Z, Yu Q, Yin J, Yang W. Different functional network connectivity patterns in epilepsy: A rest-state fMRI study on mesial temporal lobe epilepsy and benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spike. Frontiers in neurology. 2021 May 28;12:668856.
12. Harmsen IE, Rowland NC, Wennberg RA, Lozano AM. Characterizing the effects of deep brain stimulation with magnetoencephalography: a review. Brain stimulation. 2018 May 1;11(3):481-91.
13. Mosley PE, Windels F, Morris J, Coyne T, Marsh R, Giorni A, et al. A randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled trial of deep brain stimulation of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder. Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 5;11(1):410.
14. Sankar T, Chakravarty MM, Bescos A, Lara M, Obuchi T, Laxton AW, et al. Deep Brain Stimulation Influences Brain Structure in Alzheimer's Disease. Brain Stimul. 2015 May-Jun;8(3):645-54.
15. Conroy SK, Holtzheimer PE. Neuromodulation strategies for the treatment of depression. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;178(12):1082-8.
16. Bergfeld IO, Mantione M, Hoogendoorn ML, Ruhé HG, Notten P, van Laarhoven J, Visser I, Figee M, de Kwaasteniet BP, Horst F, Schene AH. Deep brain stimulation of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule for treatment-resistant depression: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA psychiatry. 2016 May 1;73(5):456-64.
17. Kubu CS, Ford PJ, Wilt JA, Moberg PJ, Pugh J, Mayberg HS. Pragmatism and the Importance of Interdisciplinary Teams in Investigating Personality Change Following DBS. AJOB Neurosci. 2021;12(2-3):180-190.
18. Krauss JK, Lipsman N, Aziz T, Boutet A, Brown P, Chang JW, et al. Technology of deep brain stimulation: current status and future directions. Nat Rev Neurol. 2021;17(2):75-87.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Abbas Ali, Adeel Ur Rehman, Irfan Adil, Muhammad Abbas Wajri, Evangel Faraz Bashir, Farhan Ahmed (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.