Treatment Outcomes of Decompressive Craniectomy in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury

Authors

  • Noor Ahmed Department of Neurosurgery, Bolan Medical College at Sandeman Provincial Teaching Hospital, Quetta, Pakistan Author
  • Abid Langove Department of Neurosurgery, Bolan Medical College at Sandeman Provincial Teaching Hospital, Quetta, Pakistan Author
  • Asghar Khan Baber Department of Neurosurgery, Bolan Medical College at Sandeman Provincial Teaching Hospital, Quetta, Pakistan Author
  • Nasr Ullah Langove Department of Neurosurgery, Bolan Medical College at Sandeman Provincial Teaching Hospital, Quetta, Pakistan Author
  • Irfan Adil Department of Neurosurgery, Bolan Medical College at Sandeman Provincial Teaching Hospital, Quetta, Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61919/9mm00a669mm00a66

Keywords:

Traumatic Brain Injury, Decompressive Craniectomy, Intracranial Hypertension, Neurosurgical Procedures, Glasgow Coma Scale, Treatment Outcome, Prognosis

Abstract

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a significant global health burden, with elevated intracranial pressure as a major cause of mortality and disability. The timing of decompressive craniectomy for severe TBI is controversial, with limited evidence on whether ultra-early intervention improves survival or neurological outcomes. Objective: This study aimed to compare survival rates, functional outcomes, and complications between ultra-early (<4 hours) and later decompressive craniectomy in patients with severe TBI, and to identify prognostic factors influencing these outcomes. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary neurosurgical center, including 127 adults with severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale 3–8) undergoing decompressive craniectomy between January 2021 and December 2023. Inclusion required age ≥18 years and blunt head trauma; exclusions were hypotension, hypoxia, penetrating injury, whole brain ischemia, or non-survivable comorbidities. Data on demographics, injury characteristics, radiological findings (Marshall CT classification), timing of surgery, and outcomes (modified Rankin Scale) were extracted. Statistical analysis used SPSS version 23.0 with t-tests, chi-square tests, and multivariable logistic regression. Ethical approval was obtained in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. Results: Of 127 patients (mean age 49.7 years, 76.4% male), 60 underwent ultra-early surgery. Overall mortality was 68.5%. Favorable outcome rates did not differ significantly between ultra-early and later groups (3.3% vs. 6.0%, p=0.678). Independent predictors of mortality included age >50 (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.52–6.91, p=0.002), GCS ≤5 (OR 4.75, 95% CI 2.12–10.6, p<0.001), and Marshall Class 4 CT (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.07–4.48, p=0.031), but not surgical timing. Conclusion: Ultra-early decompressive craniectomy does not significantly improve survival or functional outcomes over later intervention in severe TBI. Clinical decision-making should prioritize patient-specific prognostic factors, emphasizing comprehensive assessment for optimal management and resource allocation in human healthcare.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Noor Ahmed, Abid Langove, Asghar Khan Baber, Nasr Ullah Langove, Irfan Adil. Treatment Outcomes of Decompressive Craniectomy in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury. JHWCR [Internet]. 2025 May 28 [cited 2026 Mar. 4];3(5):e285. Available from: https://jhwcr.com/index.php/jhwcr/article/view/285

Most read articles by the same author(s)