Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Urdu Version of the Diastasis Recti Postpartum Questionnaire for Pakistani Postpartum Women

Authors

  • Mehwish Khan School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Nursing and Applied Science, Lincoln University College, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia Author
  • Muhammad Fahad Khan Institute of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan Author
  • Chua Siew Kuan School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Nursing and Applied Science, Lincoln University College, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia , School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, SEGi University Kota Damansara, Malaysia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61919/1w8xtg65

Keywords:

Diastasis recti; postpartum; questionnaire validation; cross-cultural adaptation; Urdu; psychometrics.

Abstract

Background: Diastasis recti abdominis (DRA) is common in postpartum women and is associated with pain, functional limitation, and psychological distress, yet few condition-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are available in non-Western settings (1–7,9,11–13,27,28). Objective: To translate, culturally adapt, and psychometrically validate the Urdu version of the Physical and Mental Well-being related to Diastasis Recti Postpartum Questionnaire (PM-DRQ) in middle-aged Pakistani postpartum women with DRA. Methods: A cross-sectional validation study was conducted among 80 postpartum women aged 35–45 years with DRA ≥2.5 cm attending four maternity hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan. Translation followed international guidelines with forward–back translation, expert committee review, and cognitive debriefing (14–17,23–26). Participants completed the Urdu PM-DRQ, a visual analogue scale for pain, the Modified Oswestry Disability Index, and the Maternal Postpartum Quality of Life Questionnaire (9,10,14,18–20). Internal consistency, test–retest reliability, content, construct, criterion, and known-groups validity, and floor/ceiling effects were evaluated (14,18). Results: Cronbach’s α was 0.89 for the total scale and 0.85 and 0.82 for physical and psychological domains, respectively. Test–retest ICC was 0.88. A two-factor structure explained 68.4% of variance with acceptable CFA fit (CFI 0.92, TLI 0.90, RMSEA 0.076). PM-DRQ scores correlated strongly with pain and disability and discriminated between DRA severity and low back pain subgroups (all p<0.001). No floor or ceiling effects were observed. Conclusion: The Urdu PM-DRQ is a reliable, valid, and culturally appropriate PROM for assessing physical and psychological impacts of DRA in Pakistani postpartum women.

 

References

1. Lin S, Lu J, Wang L, Zhang Y, Zhu C, Qian S, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of diastasis recti abdominis in the long-term postpartum: a cross-sectional study. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):25640. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-76974-x.

2. Cavalli M, Aiolfi A, Bruni PG, Manfredini L, Lombardo F, Bonfanti MT, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for diastasis recti abdominis: a review and proposal of a new anatomical variation. Hernia. 2021;25(4):1165–81. doi:10.1007/s10029-021-02468-8.

3. Sperstad JB, Tennfjord MK, Hilde G, Ellström-Engh M, Bø K. Diastasis recti abdominis during pregnancy and 12 months after childbirth: prevalence, risk factors and report of lumbopelvic pain. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(17):1092–6. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096065.

4. Wang L, Zhu C, Zhang J, Sun S, She H, Meng L, et al. Long-term outcomes of diastasis recti abdominis in postpartum women: a retrospective cohort study. Int Urogynecol J. 2024;35(12):2413–21. doi:10.1007/s00192-024-05930-0.

5. Sokunbi G, Camino-Willhuber G, Paschal PK, Olufade O, Hussain FS, Shue J, et al. Is diastasis recti abdominis associated with low back pain? A systematic review. World Neurosurg. 2023;174:119–25. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2023.03.014.

6. Werner LA, Dayan M. Diastasis recti abdominis—diagnosis, risk factors, effect on musculoskeletal function, framework for treatment and implications for the pelvic floor. Curr Womens Health Rev. 2019;15(2):86–101. doi:10.2174/1573404814666180222152952.

7. Zhu Y, Jiang L, Ye T, Liu Y, Sun L, Xiao L, et al. Risk factors and patient-reported outcomes in Chinese women with postpartum diastasis recti abdominis: an observational study. Int J Womens Health. 2024;16:179–92. doi:10.2147/IJWH.S437088.

8. Meireles JF, Neves CM, Morgado FF, Muzik M, Ferreira ME. Development and psychometric properties of the Self-Acceptance Scales for Pregnant and Postpartum Women. Percept Mot Skills. 2021;128(1):258–82. doi:10.1177/0031512520973518.

9. Malik A, Asghar M, Shafiq H, Malik E, Malik S, Azam M. Prevalence of post-partum low back pain among primigravida females: a cross-sectional survey. J Health Wellness Community Res. 2025;Aug 29:e708. doi:10.61919/r3prbs43.

10. Hill PD, Aldag JC, Hekel B, Riner G, Bloomfield P. Maternal Postpartum Quality of Life Questionnaire. J Nurs Meas. 2006;14(3):205–20. doi:10.1891/jnm-v14i3a005.

11. Keshwani N, McLean L. Ultrasound imaging in postpartum women with diastasis recti: intrarater between-session reliability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015;45(9):713–8. doi:10.2519/jospt.2015.5879.

12. Benjamin DR, Frawley HC, Shields N, van de Water ATM, Taylor NF. Relationship between interrectus distance and symptom severity in women with diastasis recti abdominis in the early postpartum period. Physiotherapy. 2018;104(3):316–22. doi:10.1016/j.physio.2018.07.002.

13. Michalska A, Rokita W, Wolder D, Pogorzelska J, Kaczmarczyk K. Diastasis recti abdominis—a review of treatment methods. Ginekol Pol. 2018;89(2):97–101. doi:10.5603/GP.a2018.0016.

14. Garcia-Esteve L, Torres A, Lasheras G, Palacios-Hernández B, Farré-Sender B, Subirà S, et al. Assessment of psychometric properties of the Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire (PBQ) in Spanish mothers. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2016;19(2):385–94. doi:10.1007/s00737-015-0589-x.

15. Abdolalipour S, Abbasalizadeh S, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, Abbasalizadeh F, Jahanfar S, Jafarabadi MA, et al. Translation and measurement properties of pregnancy and childbirth questionnaire in Iranian postpartum women. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024;24(1):365. doi:10.1186/s12913-024-10689-7.

16. Pei LB, Xia JJ, Yan JL. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire. J Int Med Res. 2010;38(5):1985–96. doi:10.1177/147323001003800612.

17. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186–91. doi:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.

18. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.

19. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(22):2940–52. doi:10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017.

20. Symon A. A review of mothers’ prenatal and postnatal quality of life. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:38. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-1-38.

21. Gluppe SB, Ellström-Engh M, Bø K. Effect of a postpartum training program on the prevalence of diastasis recti abdominis in primiparous women: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2018;98(4):260–8. doi:10.1093/ptj/pzy008.

22. Gutke A, Sjödahl J, Öberg B. Specific muscle stabilizing home exercises for persistent pelvic girdle pain after pregnancy: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42(10):929–35. doi:10.2340/16501977-0615.

23. Beck CT, Gable RK. Postpartum Depression Screening Scale: development and psychometric testing. Nurs Res. 2000;49(5):272–82. doi:10.1097/00006199-200009000-00006.

24. Wu D, Hong Y, Guan J, Huang Z, Liang H, Wen L, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.0. Front Psychol. 2025;16:1468923. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1468923.

25. Abdolalipour S, Abbasalizadeh S, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, Abbasalizadeh F, Jahanfar S, Asghari Jafarabadi M, et al. Translation and measurement properties of pregnancy and childbirth questionnaire in Iranian postpartum women. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024;24(1):365. doi:10.1186/s12913-024-10689-7.

26. Sari IN, Sansuwito T, Prihadianto DG. Development and psychometric validation of the Indonesian versions of the Postpartum Blues and Maternal Self-Efficacy Scales. F1000Research. 2024;14:789. doi:10.12688/f1000research.168513.2.

27. Ayesha I, Nisa MU, Javed M, Mahmood SS, Khan I, Inam AB. Psychological comorbidities in women having diastasis recti—narrative review. J Health Wellness Community Res. 2025;Sep 11:e729. doi:10.61919/whn57x10.

28. Skoura A, Billis E, Papanikolaou DT, Xergia S, Tsarbou C, Tsekoura M, et al. Diastasis recti abdominis rehabilitation in the postpartum period: a scoping review of current clinical practice. Int Urogynecol J. 2024;35:491–520. doi:10.1007/s00192-024-05727-1.

29. Zhu Y, Jiang L, Ye T, Liu Y, Sun L, Xiao L, et al. Risk factors and patient-reported outcomes in Chinese women with postpartum diastasis recti abdominis: an observational study. Int J Womens Health. 2024;16:179–92. doi:10.2147/IJWH.S437088.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Mehwish Khan, Muhammad Fahad Khan, Chua Siew Kuan. Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Urdu Version of the Diastasis Recti Postpartum Questionnaire for Pakistani Postpartum Women. JHWCR [Internet]. 2025 Nov. 30 [cited 2025 Dec. 14];3(17):e975. Available from: https://jhwcr.com/index.php/jhwcr/article/view/975

Most read articles by the same author(s)