Association of Depth of Impacted Maxillary Third Molar with the Prevalence of Radiolucencies and Pathologies Associated with the Adjacent Maxillary Second Molar with Respect to Gender

Authors

  • Saman Fatima Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Zulkaif Younas Sharif Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Emaan Ahmad Sharif Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Sumayya Sharif Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Hafsa Lateef Sharif Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Maryam Tahreem Lahore Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Hira Butt General Dental Practice, Lahore, Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61919/wgz36202

Keywords:

Maxillary third molars, impaction depth, periapical radiolucencies, pericoronal radiolucencies, external root resorption, dental caries, gender differences

Abstract

Background: Impaction of maxillary third molars is a common clinical finding that can lead to various pathological changes in adjacent teeth, including periapical and pericoronal radiolucencies, distal dental caries, and external root resorption in the adjacent maxillary second molar. Factors such as the depth of impaction and patient gender may influence the prevalence and severity of these pathologies, but evidence remains inconclusive. Objective: To assess the association between the depth of impacted maxillary third molars and the prevalence of radiolucencies and pathologies in the adjacent maxillary second molar, with a focus on gender differences. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 235 orthopantomograms of patients aged 21 years and above presenting with impacted maxillary third molars. The depth of impaction was classified according to the Pell and Gregory system. The presence of periapical and pericoronal radiolucencies, distal dental caries, and external root resorption in adjacent second molars was evaluated. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 24.0, and associations were tested using Fisher’s exact test, with a significance level set at p ≤ 0.05. Results: Among the study population, 71.5% of third molars were classified as Class C impactions and 28.5% as Class B. No statistically significant association was observed between impaction depth and any of the assessed pathologies in either males or females (p > 0.05). However, periapical radiolucencies were more frequent in Class C impactions (67% in males, 78.9% in females), while external root resorption and distal caries were slightly more prevalent in Class B impactions among males. In females, all pathologies were predominantly associated with Class C impactions. Conclusion: Although no statistically significant relationship was identified, deeper impactions (Class C) demonstrated a greater tendency to be associated with pathological changes in adjacent second molars, particularly among females. These findings suggest that impaction depth remains a clinically relevant factor, and careful radiographic evaluation and timely intervention are recommended to prevent potential complications

References

1. De Sousa AS, Neto JV-, Normando DJPiO. The prediction of impacted versus spontaneously erupted mandibular third molars. 2021;22(1):29.

2. Alfadil L, Almajed EJTSdj. Prevalence of impacted third molars and the reason for extraction in Saudi Arabia. 2020;32(5):262-8.

3. Aggarwal D, Chandra A, Gupta S, Jain A, Shetty DCJSJoRiDS. Assessing impacted third molars: Cellular activity in dental follicles and dentigerous cysts. 2023;14(4):184-8.

4. Prasanna Kumar D, Sharma M, Vijaya Lakshmi G, Subedar RS, Nithin V, Patil VJJom, et al. Pathologies associated with second mandibular molar due to various types of impacted third molar: A comparative clinical study. 2022;21(4):1126-39.

5. Li D, Tao Y, Cui M, Zhang W, Zhang X, Hu XJCoi. External root resorption in maxillary and mandibular second molars associated with impacted third molars: a cone-beam computed tomographic study. 2019;23(12):4195-203.

6. Enabulele J, Obuekwe OJJoo, maxillofacial surgery m, pathology. Prevalence of caries and cervical resorption on adjacent second molar associated with impacted third molar. 2017;29(4):301-5.

7. Ahmed J, Nath M, Sujir N, Ongole R, Shenoy NJTODJ. Correlation of pericoronal radiolucency around impacted mandibular third molars using CBCT with histopathological diagnosis: A prospective study. 2022;16(1).

8. Smailienė D, Trakinienė G, Beinorienė A, Tutlienė UJM. Relationship between the position of impacted third molars and external root resorption of adjacent second molars: a retrospective CBCT study. 2019;55(6):305.

9. Pinto AC, Francisco H, Marques D, Martins JN, Caramês JJJoCM. Worldwide Prevalence and Demographic Predictors of Impacted Third Molars—Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. 2024;13(24):7533.

10. Passi D, Singh G, Dutta S, Srivastava D, Chandra L, Mishra S, et al. Study of pattern and prevalence of mandibular impacted third molar among Delhi-National Capital Region population with newer proposed classification of mandibular impacted third molar: A retrospective study. 2019;10(1):59-67.

11. Yang Y, Tian Y, Sun L-J, Qu H-L, Li Z-B, Tian B-M, et al. The impact of anatomic features of asymptomatic third molars on the pathologies of adjacent second molars: a cross-sectional analysis. 2023;73(3):417-22.

12. AlHobail SQ, Baseer MA, Ingle NA, Assery MK, AlSanea JA, AlMugeiren OMJJoISoP, et al. Evaluation distal caries of the second molars in the presence of third molars among Saudi patients. 2019;9(5):505-12.

13. Al-Madani SO, Jaber M, Prasad P, Maslamani MJMAJJocm. The patterns of impacted third molars and their associated pathologies: a retrospective observational study of 704 patients. 2024;13(2):330.

14. Obuekwe O, Enabulele JJA. Gender variation in pattern of mandibular third molar impaction. 2017;20(5):2-8.

15. Syed KB, Zaheer KB, Ibrahim M, Bagi MA, Assiri MAJJoiohJ. Prevalence of impacted molar teeth among Saudi population in Asir region, Saudi Arabia–a retrospective study of 3 years. 2013;5(1):43.

16. Juodzbalys GJQI. A classification for assessing surgical difficulty in the extraction of mandibular impacted third molars: Description and clinical validation. 2018;49(1):745-53.

17. Quek S, Tay C, Tay K, Toh S, Lim KJIjoo, surgery m. Pattern of third molar impaction in a Singapore Chinese population: a retrospective radiographic survey. 2003;32(5):548-52.

18. Hassan AHJC, cosmetic, dentistry i. Pattern of third molar impaction in a Saudi population. 2010:109-13.

19. Arandi N, Abu-Ali M, Abu-Labban N. Prevalence of distal caries in second molars associated with impacted third molars in panoramic radiographs %J BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):68.

20. Baykul T, Saglam AA, Aydin U, Başak KJOS, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology,, Endodontology. Incidence of cystic changes in radiographically normal impacted lower third molar follicles. 2005;99(5):542-5.

21. Kahl B, Gerlach K, Hilgers R-DJIjoo, surgery m. A long-term, follow-up, radiographic evaluation of asymptomatic impacted third molars in orthodontically treated patients. 1994;23(5):279-85.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Fatima S, Younas Z, Ahmad E, Sumayya, Lateef H, Tahreem M, et al. Association of Depth of Impacted Maxillary Third Molar with the Prevalence of Radiolucencies and Pathologies Associated with the Adjacent Maxillary Second Molar with Respect to Gender. JHWCR [Internet]. 2025 Sep. 28 [cited 2025 Sep. 30];:e815. Available from: https://jhwcr.com/index.php/jhwcr/article/view/815

Most read articles by the same author(s)