Serum Estradiol and Progesterone Profiles in Obese Women with Irregular Versus Regular Menstrual Cycles: A Hospital-Based Case–Control Study from Sialkot

Authors

  • Anam Ziarat Department of Zoology, University of Sialkot, Sialkot, Pakistan Author
  • Saima Ashraf Department of Zoology, University of Sialkot, Sialkot, Pakistan Author
  • Asad Shabbir Department of Zoology, University of Sialkot, Sialkot, Pakistan Author
  • Nadia Nazish Department of Zoology, University of Sialkot, Sialkot, Pakistan Author
  • Muhammad Awais Department of Zoology, University of Sialkot, Sialkot, Pakistan Author
  • Ayesha Ijaz Department of Zoology, University of Sialkot, Sialkot, Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61919/74tfer51

Keywords:

obesity, estradiol, progesterone, menstrual irregularity, luteal insufficiency, reproductive endocrinology, case–control study

Abstract

Background: Obesity is a well-established risk factor for reproductive dysfunction, often disrupting the balance between estradiol and progesterone that regulates normal menstrual cyclicity. Elevated estradiol through aromatization in adipose tissue and inadequate luteal progesterone production may jointly contribute to irregular cycles and infertility in obese women, but comparative evidence remains limited in South Asian populations. Objective: This study aimed to investigate serum estradiol and progesterone profiles in obese women with irregular versus regular menstrual cycles and evaluate their diagnostic performance in predicting menstrual dysfunction. Methods: A hospital-based case–control study was conducted among 80 obese women aged 18–45 years, recruited from tertiary facilities in Sialkot, Pakistan. Cases were defined as women with self-reported irregular cycles (n=40), while controls had regular cycles (n=40). Clinical data, anthropometry, and fasting blood samples were obtained. Estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) levels were quantified, and analyses included descriptive statistics, t-tests, logistic regression adjusted for confounders, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: Women with irregular cycles exhibited significantly higher mean estradiol (148.6 ± 117.2 vs 89.0 ± 62.1 pg/mL, p=0.005) and lower progesterone (2.3 ± 6.1 vs 6.9 ± 11.4 ng/mL, p=0.03). Low progesterone (<1 ng/mL) was more prevalent among irregular cases (60% vs 25%, RR 2.4, p=0.002). Estradiol quartile analysis showed a dose–response association with irregularity (p-trend=0.004), while higher progesterone quartiles were protective (p-trend=0.002). ROC analysis yielded AUCs of 0.77 for estradiol and 0.84 for progesterone. Conclusion: Obese women with irregular cycles demonstrate a distinct hormonal signature of estrogen excess and luteal inadequacy. Routine dual profiling of estradiol and progesterone may enhance early detection of menstrual dysfunction and guide targeted interventions to restore cycle regularity and protect reproductive health.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-09

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Anam Ziarat, Saima Ashraf, Asad Shabbir, Nadia Nazish, Muhammad Awais, Ayesha Ijaz. Serum Estradiol and Progesterone Profiles in Obese Women with Irregular Versus Regular Menstrual Cycles: A Hospital-Based Case–Control Study from Sialkot. JHWCR [Internet]. 2025 Sep. 9 [cited 2025 Oct. 30];3(12):e759. Available from: https://jhwcr.com/index.php/jhwcr/article/view/759

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>