Craniovertebral Angle Measurement with MicroDicom and Digital Photography Method, A Reliability Testing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61919/bsanzm24Keywords:
Craniovertebral angle; Forward head posture; Reliability; Intraclass correlation; Photogrammetry; Myofascial pain syndrome;Abstract
Background: The craniovertebral angle (CVA) is a practical photogrammetric metric for quantifying forward head posture (FHP) in clinical populations, yet reliability data for measurements analyzed with MicroDicom in symptomatic cohorts are limited. Objective: To determine the intra- and inter-rater reliability of CVA measured from standardized digital photographs analyzed with MicroDicom in patients with myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). Methods: In a GRRAS-informed reliability study, 40 adults with MPS were photographed in a standardized seated posture across three consecutive days. Three raters (A–C) independently acquired images (three per day) and measured CVA in MicroDicom 2023.3. For intra-rater reliability, each rater’s three day means per participant were analyzed using ICC(3,1) and ICC(3,3). For inter-rater reliability, each rater’s grand mean across days was used to estimate ICC(2,1) and ICC(2,3). Absolute error indices (SEM, MDC9595 CV) and Bland–Altman agreement (bias, 95% limits of agreement [LoA]) were reported. Day effects (within rater) and mean differences between raters were tested with Friedman’s test (k=3, df=2). Results: Mean CVA values were similar across raters (A 42.83°, B 42.49°, C 42.68°). Intra-rater reliability was good to excellent (ICC(3,1)=0.865–0.889; ICC(3,3)=0.952–0.960). Inter-rater reliability was excellent (ICC(2,1)=0.960, 95% CI 0.930–0.978; ICC(2,3)=0.986). Absolute error was small (SEM 0.833–0.919°) with MDC9595 2.31–2.55° (intra-rater) and 2.40° (inter-rater); CV ≈5%. Bland–Altman analyses showed minimal bias (A vs B +0.34°, B vs C −0.19°, A vs C +0.15°) with 95% LoA within ±2.4° and no proportional bias (slopes <0.1). No significant day effects were observed for raters B and C; rater A showed a small, non-significant trend (p=.060). A small between-rater mean difference was statistically detectable (χ²(2)=6.752, p=.034) but clinically trivial given the high ICCs and narrow LoA. Conclusion: Standardized smartphone photogrammetry analyzed with MicroDicom yields highly reproducible CVA measurements in MPS, with SEM <1° and MDC9595 ≈2.3–2.6°. The protocol is suitable for routine assessment and longitudinal monitoring of FHP in clinical settings, particularly where low-cost, radiation-free methods are preferred. Future work should isolate pure rating agreement using shared images and validate against radiographic or 3D motion-capture references.
References
1. Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163.
2. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass Correlations: Uses in Assessing Rater Reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420–428.
3. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson/Prentice Hall; 2009.
4. Visscher CM, De Boer W, Lobbezoo F, Habets LLMH, Naeije M. Is There a Relationship Between Head Posture and Craniomandibular Pain? J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29(11):1030–1036.
5. Mishra P, Pandey CM, Singh U, Gupta A, Sahu C, Keshri A. Descriptive Statistics and Normality Tests for Statistical Data. Ann Card Anaesth. 2019;22(1):67–72. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_157_18
6. Van Niekerk SM, Louw QA, Vaughan CL. Photographic Measurement of Upper-Body Sitting Posture of High School Students: A Reliability and Validity Study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:113.
7. Raine S, Twomey LT. Head and Shoulder Posture Variations in 160 Asymptomatic Women and Men. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(11):1215–1223.
8. Ruivo RM, Pezarat-Correia P, Carita AI. Intrarater and Interrater Reliability of Photographic Measurement of Upper-Body Standing Posture of Adolescents. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015;38(1):74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.10.009
9. Harman K, Hubley-Kozey CL, Butler H. Effectiveness of an Exercise Program to Improve Forward Head Posture in Normal Adults: A Randomized, Controlled 10-Week Trial. J Man Manip Ther. 2005;13:163–176. https://doi.org/10.1179/106698105790824888
10. Griegel-Morris P, Larson K, Mueller-Klaus K, Oatis CA. Incidence of Common Postural Abnormalities in the Cervical, Shoulder, and Thoracic Regions and Their Association With Pain in Two Age Groups of Healthy Subjects. Phys Ther. 1992;72(6):425–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/72.6.425
11. Mahmoud NF, Hassan KA, Abdelmajeed SF, Moustafa IM, Silva AG. The Relationship Between Forward Head Posture and Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019;12:562–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-019-09594-y
12. Liu T, Tian S, Zhang J, He M, Deng L, Ding W, et al. Comparison of Cervical Sagittal Parameters Among Patients With Neck Pain and Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy and Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. Orthop Surg. 2024;16:329–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.13951
13. Pivotto LR, Navarro IJRL, Candotti CT. Radiography and Photogrammetry-Based Methods of Assessing Cervical Spine Posture in the Sagittal Plane: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. Gait Posture. 2021;84:357–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.12.033
14. Quek J, Pua YH, Clark RA, Bryant AL. Effects of Thoracic Kyphosis and Forward Head Posture on Cervical Range of Motion in Older Adults. Man Ther. 2013;18(1):65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2012.07.005
15. Mylonas K, Tsekoura M, Billis E, Aggelopoulos P, Tsepis E, Fousekis K. Reliability and Validity of Non-Radiographic Methods of Forward Head Posture Measurement: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2022;14(8):e27696. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.27696
16. Lu Y, Cheng J, Fan B, Liu YQ, Yu SY, Zhang DY, et al. ICD-11 Chinese Compilation of Chronic Pain Classification. Zhongguo Tengtong Yixue Zazhi. 2018;24:801–805.
17. Carrasco-Uribarren A, Marimon X, Dantony F, Cabanillas-Barea S, Portela A, Ceballos-Laita L, et al. A Computer Vision–Based Application for the Assessment of Head Posture: A Validation and Reliability Study. Appl Sci. 2023;13(6):3910. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13063910
18. Mylonas K, Chatzis G, Makrypidi V, Chrysanthopoulos G, Gkrilias P, Tsekoura M, et al. Reliability of Photogrammetric Evaluation of the Craniovertebral Angle, Swayback Posture, and Knee Hyperextension in University Students. J Phys Ther Sci. 2025;37(4):171–175. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.37.171
19. Ferreira EA, Duarte M, Maldonado EP, Burke TN, Marques AP. Postural Assessment Software (PAS/SAPO): Validation and Reliability. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2010;65(7):675–681. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322010000700005
20. Cote R, Vietas C, Kolakowski M, Lombardo K, Prete J, Dashottar A. Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of Measuring Photometric Craniovertebral Angle Using a Cloud-Based Video Communication Platform. Int J Telerehabil. 2021;13(1):e6346. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2021.6346
21. Helmy NA, El-Sayyad MM, Kattabeib OM. Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability of Surgimap Spine Software for Spinal Postural Angles. Bull Fac Phys Ther. 2015;20:193–199.
22. Aafreen A, Khan AA, Ahmad A, Khan AR, Maurya N, Alameer MM, et al. Clinimetric Properties of a Smartphone Application to Measure the Craniovertebral Angle in Different Age Groups and Positions. Heliyon. 2023;9:e19336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19336
23. Titcomb DA, Melton BF, Bland HW, Miyashita T. Evaluation of the Craniovertebral Angle in Standing Versus Sitting Positions in Young Adults With and Without Severe Forward Head Posture. Int J Exerc Sci. 2024;17(1):73–85. https://doi.org/10.70252/GDNN4363
24. Gadotti IC, Magee D. Validity of Surface Markers Placement on the Cervical Spine for Craniocervical Posture Assessment. Man Ther. 2013;18(3):243–247.
25. Longoni L, Brunati R, Sale P, Casale R, Ronconi G, Ferriero G. Smartphone Applications Validated for Joint Angle Measurement: A Systematic Review. Int J Rehabil Res. 2019;42(1):11–19.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nasir Mehmood, Suriyakala Perumal Chandran, Mazhar Ali Bhutto, Mahtab Ahmed Mukhtar Patafi, Muhammad Shahzaib Alam, Rumaisa Asad (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
