Comparing Effects of Analgesic Drugs During Spinal Anesthesia in Orthopedic Surgery

Authors

  • Ahmad Raza Department of Emerging Allied Health Technology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Superior University Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Muhammad Faisal Naeem Department of Emerging Allied Health Technology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Superior University Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Sufyan Ahmad Department of Emerging Allied Health Technology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Superior University Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Hassan Tarrar Department of Emerging Allied Health Technology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Superior University Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Haban Ur Rehman Department of Emerging Allied Health Technology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Superior University Lahore, Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61919/3db7gd95

Keywords:

Spinal Anesthesia, Orthopedic Surgery, Analgesics, Perioperative Complications, Multimodal Analgesia, Pain Management, Nerve Block

Abstract

Background: Spinal anesthesia is a widely utilized technique for orthopedic surgery, yet variability in perioperative pain and complications persists, and the moderating effects of adjunct analgesic strategies remain underexplored. Objective: This study aimed to assess the moderating effect of various adjunct analgesic techniques—including paracetamol, ketorolac, tramadol, nalbuphine, and peripheral nerve blocks—on perioperative complications in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery with spinal anesthesia. Methods: A cross-sectional, correlational study was conducted among patients (n = 152) undergoing orthopedic procedures under spinal anesthesia at Mayo Hospital Lahore. Adults over 20 years of age without significant cardiovascular, respiratory, or spinal comorbidities were enrolled using convenience sampling. Data were collected using a structured, pre-validated questionnaire, capturing demographics, surgical details, anesthetic technique, adjunct analgesic use, and perioperative complications. Ethical approval was obtained, and all procedures conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25, employing descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, correlation, and multiple regression to examine relationships and moderating effects. Results: Quincke needles (78.9%) and 25-gauge needles (67.1%) were most frequently used, with bupivacaine as the primary anesthetic (98%). The incidence of intraoperative hypotension was 57.9%, and postoperative pain was 78.3%. Adjunct analgesic techniques, when applied, were associated with a statistically significant reduction in minor to moderate perioperative complications (β = -0.425, R² = 0.231, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Adjunct analgesic strategies substantially enhance the safety and efficacy of spinal anesthesia for orthopedic surgery, reducing perioperative complications and improving patient outcomes. These findings support the adoption of multimodal analgesia in clinical practice to optimize perioperative care.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-19

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Ahmad Raza, Muhammad Faisal Naeem, Sufyan Ahmad, Hassan Tarrar, Haban Ur Rehman. Comparing Effects of Analgesic Drugs During Spinal Anesthesia in Orthopedic Surgery. JHWCR [Internet]. 2025 May 19 [cited 2025 Aug. 2];:e229. Available from: https://jhwcr.com/index.php/jhwcr/article/view/229

Most read articles by the same author(s)