The Effectiveness of Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) and Myofascial Release (MFR) in Reducing Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS) in the Cervicothoracic Region

Main Article Content

Iqra Majeed
Zermeen Zerish
Fahad Tanveer
Mohtishim Ahmed

Abstract

Background: Delayed-onset muscle soreness of the cervicothoracic region may cause pain, stiffness, functional limitation, and reduced cervical range of motion after unfamiliar or strenuous upper-body activity. Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization and myofascial release are commonly used manual therapy techniques, but their comparative short-term effects in cervicothoracic DOMS remain insufficiently defined. Objective: To compare the effects of IASTM and MFR on pain intensity, neck-related disability, and cervical range of motion in adults with cervicothoracic DOMS. Methods: This assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial included 58 participants aged 25–35 years with clinically confirmed cervicothoracic DOMS of 24–72 hours’ duration. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Green International University under approval number NCT07609498. Participants were randomized equally to IASTM (n = 29) or MFR (n = 29). Each group received three treatment sessions. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale, disability using the Neck Disability Index, and cervical ROM using goniometry. Outcomes were measured at baseline and after each session. Data were analyzed using between-group comparisons and 2 × 4 mixed-design repeated-measures ANOVA. Results: Baseline characteristics and outcome scores were comparable between groups. Both interventions produced significant improvements over time; however, IASTM showed greater final improvement than MFR in VAS (1.45 ± 0.31 vs 2.72 ± 0.35), NDI (6.10 ± 1.02 vs 9.78 ± 1.41), flexion (53.65 ± 1.71° vs 49.02 ± 2.20°), extension (59.43 ± 2.44° vs 54.42 ± 2.18°), and bilateral lateral flexion and rotation. Time × group interactions were significant for all outcomes. Conclusion: Both IASTM and MFR improved cervicothoracic DOMS over three sessions, but IASTM produced greater short-term reductions in pain and disability and larger improvements in cervical ROM.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Iqra Majeed, Zermeen Zerish, Fahad Tanveer, Mohtishim Ahmed. The Effectiveness of Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) and Myofascial Release (MFR) in Reducing Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS) in the Cervicothoracic Region. JHWCR [Internet]. 2026 Jun. 6 [cited 2026 Jun. 7];4(11):1-12. Available from: https://jhwcr.com/index.php/jhwcr/article/view/1731

References

1. Agarwal S, Bedekar N, Shyam A, Sancheti P. Comparison between effects of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization and manual myofascial release on pain, range of motion and function in myofascial pain syndrome of upper trapezius: a randomized controlled trial. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2024;44:57-67.

2. Kim YM, Shin HY. The effect of myofascial release and cervical traction on pain, range of motion and the Neck Disability Index in patients with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Korean Soc Phys Med. 2024;19:107-17.

3. Ashok A, Suganya M, Arun B. Comparison of myofascial release, muscle energy technique and cervical manual therapy in postural neck pain. Asian J Orthop Res. 2019;2:69-74.

4. Islam MS, Ahmed F, Hossain MA, Haque MO, Xiao J, Uddin MK, et al. Effectiveness of myofascial release along with conventional physiotherapy for chronic neck pain patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Physiother. 2024;2:1-8.

5. Gulick DT. Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization increases myofascial trigger point pain threshold. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018;22:341-5.

6. Tang S, Sheng L, Xia J, Xu B, Jin P. The effectiveness of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization on range of motion: a meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024;25:319.

7. Rodríguez-Huguet M, Rodríguez-Almagro D, Rodríguez-Huguet P, Martín-Valero R, Lomas-Vega R. Treatment of neck pain with myofascial therapies: a single blind randomized controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2020;43:160-70.

8. Lin HW, Chen YW, Liao CD, Tam KW, Huang SW, Hsu TH. Efficacy of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization on patients with neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Disabil Rehabil. 2025:1-16.

9. Sabir Z, Bashir S, Gul S, Batool SS. Effectiveness of manual myofascial release versus instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization in patients with chronic neck pain: RCT. J Riphah Coll Rehabil Sci. 2025;13.

10. Shewail F, Abdelmajeed S, Farouk M, Abdelmegeed M. Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization versus myofascial release therapy in treatment of chronic neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023;24:457.

11. Shamseldeen NE, Hegazy MMA, Fayaz NA, Mahmoud NF. Instrumented assisted soft tissue mobilization vs extracorporeal shock wave therapy in treatment of myofascial pain syndrome. World J Orthop. 2023;14:572.

12. Dissanayaka TD, Pallegama RW, Suraweera HJ, Johnson MI, Kariyawasam AP. Comparison of the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and interferential therapy on the upper trapezius in myofascial pain syndrome: a randomized controlled study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;95:663-72.

13. Elagamawy MI, Elsayed WH, Zahran MR. Effect of muscle energy technique versus instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization in upper trapezius myofascial trigger points. Egypt J Phys Ther. 2023;16:7-16.

14. Tang S, Sheng L, Wei X, Liang M, Xia J, Chen J. The effectiveness of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization on pain and function in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025;26:257.

15. Stuber K. The efficacy of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization for musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review. 2023.

16. Overmann L, Schleip R, Anheyer D, Michalak J. Effectiveness of myofascial release for adults with chronic neck pain: a meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2024;123:56-68.

17. Shinde S, Jethwa K, Pawar D. Comparative study between instrumental assisted soft tissue mobilization and static stretching on delayed onset of muscle soreness in young adult female. Int J Health Sci Res. 2022;12:187-96.

18. Mahmood T, Abrar A, Atif MM, Mahmood W, Batool F. Effect of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization versus myofascial release therapy for pain, mobility, and disability in chronic low backache patients: a quasi-experimental study. Anaesth Pain Intensive Care. 2024;28:452-8.

19. Cheatham SW, Baker RT, Loghmani MT, Schleip R. International expert consensus on instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization precautions and contraindications: a modified Delphi study. Healthcare. 2025;13:642.

20. Mylonas K, Angelopoulos P, Billis E, Tsepis E, Fousekis K. Combining targeted instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization applications and neuromuscular exercises can correct forward head posture and improve the functionality of patients with mechanical neck pain: a randomized control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22:212.