A Comparative Trial of Early Colchicine Initiation Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Prevent Peri-Stent Inflammation and Restenosis

Main Article Content

Muhammad Rizwan
Zeeshan Ali
Maryam Ashraf
Adil Khaliq
Shaikh Khalid Muhammad
Akif Saeed Ch

Abstract

Background: Peri-stent inflammation contributes to neointimal proliferation and in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention despite advances in drug-eluting stent technology and standard pharmacological therapy. Colchicine has established anti-inflammatory effects, but its early use after PCI for reducing peri-stent inflammation remains insufficiently defined. Objective: To evaluate whether early colchicine initiation after PCI reduces inflammatory biomarker levels and the incidence of in-stent restenosis compared with standard post-PCI therapy alone. Methods: This parallel-group randomized controlled trial enrolled 72 patients who underwent successful PCI with drug-eluting stent implantation. Participants were randomized equally to colchicine plus standard therapy or standard therapy alone. Colchicine was administered for three months. The final complete-case analysis included 67 participants. Outcomes included hs-CRP, IL-6, angiographic in-stent restenosis, angina severity, ESR, and major adverse cardiovascular events at three months. Results: At three months, hs-CRP was lower in the colchicine group than in controls (2.1 ± 0.8 vs 3.8 ± 1.1 mg/L; p<0.001), as was IL-6 (4.6 ± 1.4 vs 7.2 ± 1.9 pg/mL; p<0.001). In-stent restenosis occurred in 9.1% versus 26.5% of participants, respectively (p=0.037). Angina severity, ESR, and major adverse cardiovascular events also favored colchicine therapy. Conclusion: Early colchicine initiation after PCI was associated with reduced inflammatory activity and lower observed restenosis at three months, although larger multicenter trials with longer follow-up are needed.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Muhammad Rizwan, Zeeshan Ali, Maryam Ashraf, Adil Khaliq, Shaikh Khalid Muhammad, Akif Saeed Ch. A Comparative Trial of Early Colchicine Initiation Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Prevent Peri-Stent Inflammation and Restenosis. JHWCR [Internet]. 2026 Mar. 15 [cited 2026 Jun. 5];4(5):1-9. Available from: https://jhwcr.com/index.php/jhwcr/article/view/1726

References

1. Pelliccia F, Zimarino M, Niccoli G, Morrone D, De Luca G, Miraldi F, et al. In-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: emerging knowledge on biological pathways. 2023;3(5).

2. Merinopoulos I, Gunawardena T, Corballis N, Tsampasian V, Eccleshall SC, Smith J, et al. The role of inflammation in percutaneous coronary intervention, from balloon angioplasty to drug-eluting stents. 2023;71(6):631-42.

3. Cecchi E, Granchietti AG, Mazzotta R, Garofalo M, Panichella G, Iula G, et al. Stent thrombosis: a narrative review from pathophysiology to therapy. 2026;49(4).

4. Yu M, Jiang Y, Song Z, Wei ZY, Tan F, Liu X, et al. Anti-inflammatory therapy for recurrent in-stent restenosis (AI-ISR): study protocol for a prospective, randomised, open-label, multicentre clinical trial. 2025;15(10).

5. Bai H, Zhang B, Sun Y, Wang X, Luan B, Zhang X. Research advances in the etiology of in-stent restenosis of coronary arteries. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025;12:1585102.

6. Gao Y, Shi Q, Shi Z, Zhang Z, Gu YS, Ma C, et al. Integrating network pharmacology and experimental verification to explore the targets for colchicine against coronary in-stent restenosis. 2026.

7. Wang K, Yin Z, Zhang Y, Wu X, Fan L. From bench to clinic: advances in anti-inflammatory therapies for atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. 2025;39(18).

8. Giordano S, Camera M, Brambilla M, Sarto G, Spadafora L, Bernardi M, et al. Combining colchicine and antiplatelet therapy to tackle atherothrombosis: a paradigm in transition? 2025;26(3):1136.

9. Boczar KE. Inflammation in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a heart on fire. Ottawa: University of Ottawa; 2026.

10. Merinopoulos I. Outcomes and monocyte response in percutaneous coronary intervention. Norwich: University of East Anglia; 2024.

11. Deng C, Liu Z, Zhao R, Shi B. Intravascular imaging and functional assessment for coronary in-stent restenosis: current status and future directions. Int J Cardiol. 2025;421:132918.

12. Agamy S, Zaghloul S, Khan Z, Shahin A, Kishk R, Smman A, et al. Innovations in diagnosis and treatment of coronary artery disease. 2025;16(1):98.

13. Shahsanaei F, Gharibzadeh A, Behrooj S, Abbaszadeh S, Nourmohammadi M. A systematic review and bioinformatic study on clinical, paraclinical, and genetic factors predisposing to stent restenosis following percutaneous coronary intervention. 2024;24(1):304.

14. Surma S, Basiak M, Romańczyk M, Filipiak KJ, Okopień B. Colchicine—from rheumatology to the new kid on the block: coronary syndromes and COVID-19. 2023;30(2):297-311.

15. Bou Sanayeh E, Salman O, Khattar G, Nevelev D, Kikuchi T, Kasai T, et al. WJC. 2025;17(5):106541.

16. Giucă A, Rocsoreanu A, Şerban M, Roşca M, Iancu M, Carp A, et al. Isolated coronary artery ectasia presenting as inferior-posterior STEMI: a case-based state-of-the-art review of the current literature. 2023;33(4).

17. De Filippo O, Wańha W, Sanavia T, Januszek R, Giacobbe F, Campo G, et al. Treatment of in-stent restenosis with ultrathin-strut versus thin-strut drug-eluting stents or drug-eluting balloons: a multicentre registry. 2024;20(21).