Systematic Review on Diagnostic and Prognostic Roles of microRNA and DNA Biomarkers in Non-Arthritic Human Diseases
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: MicroRNA and DNA-based biomarkers have emerged as promising molecular tools for early diagnosis, prognostic stratification, and disease monitoring across non-arthritic human diseases. Their clinical translation remains limited by fragmented evidence, variation in biomarker type, study design, assay platform, disease population, and outcome reporting, creating a need for systematic synthesis. Objective: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic roles of microRNA and DNA biomarkers in human non-arthritic diseases, with emphasis on early detection, disease progression, recurrence, mortality, and clinical applicability. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies included human participants with non-arthritic conditions and evaluated microRNA or DNA-based biomarkers for diagnostic or prognostic purposes. Observational and experimental studies reporting outcomes such as sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, disease progression, recurrence, survival, mortality, or hazard ratios were considered. Non-English publications, animal studies, reviews, conference abstracts, unpublished data, and studies without relevant biomarker outcomes were excluded. Data were extracted using standardized forms, methodological quality was assessed using structured appraisal criteria, and findings were synthesized narratively because of heterogeneity in study designs, disease categories, biomarkers, and outcome measures. Results: Eight studies involving diverse non-arthritic disease populations met the inclusion criteria. MicroRNA biomarkers demonstrated diagnostic potential, particularly for early disease detection, with reported sensitivity ranging from 85% to 94% and specificity from 80% to 91%. DNA-based biomarkers, including methylation patterns and circulating DNA, were associated with prognostic outcomes, including disease progression, recurrence, and survival, with hazard ratios ranging from 1.8 to 3.2. Combined biomarker approaches showed improved diagnostic and prognostic performance compared with single-marker assessment. Conclusion: MicroRNA biomarkers appear most relevant for early diagnostic discrimination, whereas DNA-based biomarkers show stronger prognostic utility across non-arthritic diseases. Larger standardized multicenter validation studies are required before routine clinical implementation
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
1. Yadav R, Singh AV, Kushwaha S, Chauhan DS. Emerging role of exosomes as a liquid biopsy tool for diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring treatment response of communicable and non-communicable diseases. Indian J Med Res. 2024;159(2):163-180.
2. Sethi Y, Patel N, Kaka N, Kaiwan O, Kar J, Moinuddin A, et al. Precision medicine and the future of cardiovascular diseases: a clinically oriented comprehensive review. J Clin Med. 2023;12(5):1799.
3. Hussein MS, Altwejry ASA, Kankoni SF, Alshaikh AH, Alsaegh MA, Alahmari AOA, et al. Beyond the vital signs: novel biomarkers in early disease detection. Saudi J Med Insights. 2025;1:1-10.
4. Sáenz-Ravello G, Hernández M, Baeza M, Hernández-Ríos P. The role of oral biomarkers in the assessment of noncommunicable diseases. Diagnostics. 2024;15(1):78.
5. Santhosh S, Jospeh S, Maria SA, Santhosh JK. Epigenetics in India: the uncharted frontier in personalized medicine. Epigenetics Rep. 2025;3(1):2583981.
6. Fathima JS, Jayaraman S, Sekar R, Syed NH. The role of microRNAs in the diagnosis and treatment of oral premalignant disorders. Oral Oncol. 2024;112(4):1023-1032.
7. Mikaeeli Kangarshahi B, Naghib SM, Rabiee N. DNA/RNA-based electrochemical nanobiosensors for early detection of cancers. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2024;61(6):473-495.
8. Ahmad A, Imran M, Ahsan H. Biomarkers as biomedical bioindicators: approaches and techniques for the detection, analysis, and validation of novel biomarkers of diseases. Pharmaceuticals. 2023;15(6):1630.
9. Liu C, Tang H, Hu N, Li T. Methylomics and cancer: the current state of methylation profiling and marker development for clinical care. Cancer Commun. 2023;23(1):242.
10. Țica O, Țica O. Molecular diagnostics in heart failure: from biomarkers to personalized medicine. Diagnostics. 2025;15(14):1807.
11. Galluzzi L, Spada S. Circulating biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment response prediction in cancer—Part A. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2025.
12. You JB, Shen SM, Fan JH, Zhen SS, Sha JM. Clinical translation of ctDNA epigenetic signatures in lung cancer: an integrated strategy for early detection, therapeutic guidance, and prognostic stratification. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2025:152636.
13. Adepoju AG, Adepoju DA. Biomarker discovery in clinical biology enhances early disease detection, prognosis, and personalized treatment strategies. Int J Adv Res Publ Rev. 2025;2:229-252.
14. Sah AK. Prognostic biomarkers: predicting disease outcomes. In: The Potential of Cancer Biomarkers. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2025. p. 211-238.
15. Li L, Sun Y. Circulating tumor DNA methylation detection as biomarker and its application in tumor liquid biopsy: advances and challenges. MedComm. 2024;5(11):e766.
16. Ponomaryova AA, Rykova EY, Solovyova AI, Tarasova AS, Kostromitsky DN, Dobrodeev AY, et al. Genomic and transcriptomic research in the discovery and application of colorectal cancer circulating markers. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(15):12407.
17. Tu X, Tu M, Xu J. Clinical application of peripheral blood biomarkers for solid tumors. MedComm Oncol. 2026;7(3):e70654.
18. Jamal MH, Porel P, Aran KR. Emerging biomarkers for pancreatic cancer: from early detection to personalized therapy. Cancer Treat Oncol. 2025;27(11):4071-4090.