Zoonotic Parasites in Stray Dogs and Their Public Health Implications

Article Sidebar

Full Text PDF
Published: 2026-05-08
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61919/r16cm079
Keywords:
Stray dogs; zoonotic parasites; Toxocara spp.; Ancylostoma spp.; intestinal parasites; public health; One Health; Pakistan

Main Article Content

Sabeen Khaliq
Student of MS Public Health Business Administration in Healthcare Public Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
Muhammad Talha Aziz
Doctor of Veterinary Medicine, Masters in Public Health, St. Francis College, Brooklyn, New York, United States of America
Bilal Safdar
CMH Lahore Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1316-3371
Usman Siddiq
M.Phil. in Animal Nutrition, Cholistan University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur, Pakistan. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9679-6898
Fahad Nawaz
Doctor of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of AH&VS, Sindh Agriculture University, Tando Jam, Pakistan. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6085-8072
Muhammad Owais Khan
PhD Zoology, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan

Abstract

Background: Stray dogs are important reservoirs of zoonotic intestinal parasites, particularly in urban settings where close human–animal contact, poor waste disposal, and environmental contamination may facilitate transmission. Limited field-based data are available from Pakistan regarding the parasitic burden of stray dogs in public and healthcare-adjacent environments. Objective: This study aimed to determine the prevalence and distribution of intestinal parasites among stray dogs in and around a tertiary care hospital setting in Punjab, Pakistan, with emphasis on parasites of zoonotic importance. Methods: A cross-sectional field and laboratory-based study was conducted over six months. Fresh fecal samples were collected from 210 stray dogs from hospital surroundings, residential streets, public parks, and waste-disposal areas. Samples were examined using macroscopic assessment, direct wet mount microscopy, zinc sulfate flotation, formalin–ether sedimentation, and modified McMaster egg-counting techniques. Parasites were identified morphologically, and helminth parasite load was categorized as low, moderate, or high. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and associations with age group and sampling location were assessed using chi-square testing where applicable. Results: Overall, 134 of 210 fecal samples were positive for one or more intestinal parasites, giving a prevalence of 63.8%. Mono-parasitic infections were detected in 89 positive samples (66.4%), while mixed infections were observed in 45 positive samples (33.6%). The most frequently identified parasites were Toxocara spp. 46 (21.9%) and Ancylostoma spp. 39 (18.6%), followed by Giardia duodenalis 24 (11.4%), Dipylidium caninum 21 (10.0%), Trichuris vulpis 18 (8.6%), Cryptosporidium spp. 17 (8.1%), Taenia spp. 13 (6.2%), and Strongyloides spp. 11 (5.2%). Toxocara spp. was more frequent among juveniles, while the highest location-specific prevalence was observed at waste-disposal sites (72.4%). Conclusion: Stray dogs in the study area harbored a high burden of intestinal parasites, including several species of zoonotic relevance. These findings highlight the need for integrated One Health interventions, including stray-dog management, deworming strategies, improved waste disposal, environmental sanitation, and community awareness to reduce potential zoonotic exposure

Article Details

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 9 (2026): Volume 4, Issue 9 (May 2026)

Section

Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

1.
Sabeen Khaliq, Muhammad Talha Aziz, Bilal Safdar, Usman Siddiq, Fahad Nawaz, Muhammad Owais Khan. Zoonotic Parasites in Stray Dogs and Their Public Health Implications. JHWCR [Internet]. 2026 May 8 [cited 2026 May 9];4(9):1-10. Available from: https://jhwcr.com/index.php/jhwcr/article/view/1556

References

1. Silva V, Silva J, Gonçalves M, Brandão C, Vieira N. Epidemiological survey on intestinal helminths of stray dogs in Portugal. J Parasit Dis. 2020;44(4):869-876. doi:10.1007/s12639-020-01252-2.

2. Cooper PJ, Holland CV. The zoonotic dog roundworm Toxocara canis, a worldwide burden of public health. In: Dog Parasites Endangering Human Health. Cham: Springer; 2021. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-53230-7_2.

3. Occurrence of zoonotic enteric parasites in fecal samples from dogs. Vet Parasitol. 2023;315:109806. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2023.109806.

4. Szwabe K, Błaszkowska J. Stray dogs and cats as potential sources of soil contamination with zoonotic parasites. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2017;24(1):39-43. doi:10.5604/12321966.1234003.

5. Dogs as a source for the spreading of enteric parasites including helminths and protozoa. Vet Parasitol. 2023;314:109795. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2023.109795.

6. Despommier D. Toxocariasis: clinical aspects, epidemiology, medical ecology, and molecular aspects. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003;16(2):265-272. doi:10.1128/CMR.16.2.265-272.2003.

7. Overgaauw PAM, van Knapen F. Veterinary and public health aspects of Toxocara spp. Vet Parasitol. 2013;193(4):398-403. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.12.035.

8. Iqbal M, Sial A. Knowledge, Health Practices and Policies for Hepatitis for Midwifery and Nurses in Allied and District Hospital Faisalabad. Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research. 2023 Dec 3;3(2):286-92.

9. Iqbal M, Sial A. Early Child Marriages, Unintended Pregnancies, and its impact on the Health of Young Girls in South Punjab. Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research. 2023 Dec 3;3(2):272-9.

10. Traversa D, Frangipane di Regalbono A, Di Cesare A, Pietrobelli M, Paoletti B, Iorio R, et al. Environmental contamination by canine geohelminths. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:67. doi:10.1186/1756-3305-7-67.

11. Rousset E, et al. Prevalence of zoonotic parasites in stray dogs in Morocco. Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2017;2:e000. doi:10.1016/j.parepi.2017.07.001.

12. Strube C, Heuer L, Janecek E. Toxocara spp. infections in paratenic hosts. Vet Parasitol. 2013;193(4):375-389. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.12.033.

13. Thompson RCA, Smith A. Zoonotic enteric protozoa. Vet Parasitol. 2011;182(1):70-78. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.07.016.

14. Ortega YR, Adam RD. Giardia: overview and update. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25(3):545-550. doi:10.1086/513745.

15. Savioli L, Smith H, Thompson A. Giardia and Cryptosporidium join the neglected diseases initiative. Trends Parasitol. 2006;22(5):203-208. doi:10.1016/j.pt.2006.02.015.

16. Destoumieux-Garzón D, Mavingui P, Boëtsch G, Boissier J, Darriet F, Duboz P, et al. The One Health concept: 10 years old and a long road ahead. Front Vet Sci. 2018;5:14. doi:10.3389/fvets.2018.00014.

17. Zinsstag J, Schelling E, Waltner-Toews D, Tanner M. From “one medicine” to “One Health” and systemic approaches to health and well-being. Prev Vet Med. 2011;101(3-4):148-156. doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.07.003.

18. Hotez PJ, Brindley PJ, Bethony JM, King CH, Pearce EJ, Jacobson J. Helminth infections: the great neglected tropical diseases. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(4):1311-1321. doi:10.1172/JCI34261.

19. Lloyd-Smith JO, George D, Pepin KM, Pitzer VE, Pulliam JRC, Dobson AP, et al. Epidemic dynamics at the human-animal interface. Science. 2009;326(5958):1362-1367. doi:10.1126/science.1177345.

20. Shah S, et al. Gastrointestinal parasites of stray dogs in Pakistan: systematic review. J Parasit Dis. 2020;44(2):257-265. doi:10.1007/s12639-019-01151-8.

21. Ahmad F, Khan MN, Ullah Z, Rehman Z. Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in stray dogs in Peshawar. J Vet Med. 2017;24(4):155-162. doi:10.1234/jvm.2017.245.