Effect of Slice Thickness on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Non-Contrast CT KUB for Renal Stone Detection

Main Article Content

Syeda Kubra
Rida Fatima
Loqman Shah
Noreena Iftikar
Kamran Khan

Abstract

Background: Non-contrast computed tomography of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder is the reference imaging modality for suspected urinary tract calculi, but its diagnostic performance may vary according to reconstruction slice thickness. Objective: To evaluate the effect of 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm axial slice thicknesses on renal stone detection, stone visibility, image noise, and radiologist diagnostic confidence in non-contrast CT KUB. Methods: This comparative cross-sectional study included 109 patients aged 18–70 years who underwent non-contrast CT KUB for suspected renal or ureteric stones. Raw CT datasets were reconstructed into 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm axial series and reviewed in randomized order by a blinded radiologist. Stone detection, visibility score, perceived image noise, and diagnostic confidence were recorded. Chi-square testing, one-way ANOVA, and logistic regression were used for analysis. Results: Stone detection was highest on 1 mm slices (81.7%), followed by 3 mm (75.2%) and 5 mm slices (63.3%; p = 0.004). Good visibility declined from 73.4% at 1 mm to 32.1% at 5 mm, while high diagnostic confidence decreased from 56.9% to 11.9% (both p < 0.001). Compared with 1 mm slices, 5 mm slices showed significantly lower odds of stone detection (OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.23–0.70; p = 0.002). Conclusion: Thin-slice 1 mm reconstruction improves renal stone detection, visibility, and diagnostic confidence on non-contrast CT KUB, despite higher perceived image noise

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Syeda Kubra, Rida Fatima, Loqman Shah, Noreena Iftikar, Kamran Khan. Effect of Slice Thickness on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Non-Contrast CT KUB for Renal Stone Detection. JHWCR [Internet]. 2026 Apr. 28 [cited 2026 Apr. 30];4(8):1-8. Available from: https://jhwcr.com/index.php/jhwcr/article/view/1508

References

1. Brisbane W, Bailey MR, Sorensen MD. An overview of kidney stone imaging techniques. Nat Rev Urol. 2016;13(11):654-662.

2. Fontenelle LF, Sarti TD. Kidney stones: treatment and prevention. Am Fam Physician. 2019;99(8):490-496.

3. Liu W, Wang M, Liu J, Yan Q, Liu M. Causal effects of modifiable risk factors on kidney stones: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study. BMC Med Genomics. 2023;16(1):82.

4. Waqas M, Khan ZA, Ahmad S, Akbar S, Khalid N. Risk factors of kidney stones in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan: a descriptive cross-sectional study. Cureus. 2024;16(6).

5. Song L, Maalouf NM. Nephrolithiasis.

6. Awedew AF, Han H, Berice BN, Dodge M, Schneider RD, Abbasi-Kangevari M, et al. The global, regional, and national burden of urolithiasis. EClinicalMedicine. 2024;78.

7. Fahad S, Haq MU, Shahid M, Munib S, Wahad F. Investigating risk factors for kidney stones. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2023;17(5):317.

8. Moftakhar L, Jafari F, Ghoddusi Johari M, Rezaeianzadeh R, Hosseini SV, Rezaianzadeh A. Prevalence and risk factors of kidney stone disease. BMC Urol. 2022;22(1):205.

9. Ding P, Luo Q, Cao L. Drug-induced kidney stones. Front Pharmacol. 2025;16:1511115.

10. Kovacevic L, Goodyer P. Renal calculi. In: Pediatric Kidney Disease. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023. p. 1221-1243.

11. Lakshmi SS, Sarella PN, Adarsh K, Padmini PL, Kumar MV. Concurrent diagnosis of renal calculi. J Clin Pharm Res. 2023:22-27.

12. Gambaro G, Croppi E, Bushinsky D, Jaeger P, Cupisti A, Ticinesi A, et al. The risk of chronic kidney disease. J Urol. 2017;198(2):268-273.

13. Wang K, Ge J, Han W, Wang D, Zhao Y, Shen Y, et al. Risk factors for kidney stone disease recurrence. BMC Urol. 2022;22(1):62.

14. Odenrick A, Kartalis N, Voulgarakis N, Morsbach F, Loizou L. The role of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in renal stone evaluation. Abdom Radiol. 2019;44:652-660.

15. Harsha U. Evaluation of efficacy of low-dose non-contrast multi-detector computed tomography in kidney stone detection. Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences; dissertation.

16. Kaur R, Juneja M. Comparison of different renal imaging modalities: an overview. In: Progress in Intelligent Computing Techniques. 2018. p. 47-57.

17. Gul P. Comparative diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CT KUB. Pak J Radiol. 2025;35(2).

18. Zisman AL. Effectiveness of treatment modalities on kidney stone recurrence. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12(10):1699-1708.

19. Fallatah M, Jaafari R, Alshammari A, et al. Imaging of kidney stones: CT urography.

20. Umbach R, Müller JK, Wendt-Nordahl G, Knoll T, Jessen JP. In-vitro comparison of different slice thicknesses for kidney stone imaging. Urolithiasis. 2019;47:583-586.