Prophylactic Phenylephrine Versus Norepinephrine Bolus for the Prevention of Post-Spinal Hypotension in Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61919/0n463616Keywords:
Norepinephrine; Phenylephrine; Post-spinal hypotension; Cesarean section; Spinal anesthesia; Vasopressor prophylaxis; Maternal hemodynamics.Abstract
Background: Spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery is frequently complicated by post-spinal hypotension, which can precipitate maternal symptoms and compromise uteroplacental perfusion; phenylephrine is commonly used for prophylaxis but may cause reflex bradycardia, while norepinephrine may better preserve chronotropy and hemodynamic stability. Objective: To compare prophylactic norepinephrine versus phenylephrine for prevention of post-spinal hypotension in parturients undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study conducted at Services Hospital, Lahore, 280 ASA I–II term parturients (n=140/group) scheduled for elective cesarean delivery received standardized spinal anesthesia and fluid co-loading, followed by prophylactic vasopressor immediately post-intrathecal injection (phenylephrine 100 µg vs norepinephrine 8 µg). Blood pressure and heart rate were recorded at 1-minute intervals until delivery and 5-minute intervals thereafter. Hypotension was defined as SBP <100 mmHg or ≥20% reduction from baseline; rescue phenylephrine 25 µg boluses and atropine for HR <50 bpm were administered per protocol. Results: Hypotension occurred less frequently with norepinephrine than phenylephrine (22.9% vs 37.1%; RR 1.62; p=0.012) and bradycardia was markedly reduced (2.9% vs 15.7%; p<0.001). Norepinephrine improved the lowest intraoperative SBP (90 ± 9 vs 85 ± 10 mmHg; p=0.001), reduced hypotensive episodes (1.1 ± 0.4 vs 1.5 ± 0.7; p=0.002), lowered rescue vasopressor use (14.3% vs 27.1%; p=0.012), and decreased nausea/vomiting (10.0% vs 20.0%; p=0.031), with no difference in NICU admission (2.9% vs 4.3%; p=0.51). Norepinephrine remained protective in adjusted analysis (aOR 0.48; 95% CI 0.27–0.84; p=0.008). Conclusion: Prophylactic norepinephrine provides superior maternal hemodynamic stability compared with phenylephrine, with substantially less bradycardia and reduced rescue vasopressor requirements, without adverse neonatal effects.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Samina Sharif, Tayyaba Ayub, Mamona Kalsoom, Yusra Waqar (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.