Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Traditional Verses ASA in Preoperative Fasting Guidelines in Elective Surgical Patients

Authors

  • Muhammad Suleman Khan The University of Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Raees Fatima The University of Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Inam Ullah The University of Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Awais Akhtar The University of Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Taimoor Riaz Ullah The University of Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Farhan Zia The University of Lahore, Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61919/npcvsp38

Keywords:

Preoperative fasting; ASA guidelines; Nil per os; Patient comfort; Postoperative nausea and vomiting; Length of hospital stay; Aspiration

Abstract

Background: Conventional “nil per os (NPO) after midnight” fasting remains common for elective surgery but may prolong discomfort and impair recovery, while American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) guidelines permit clear fluids up to 2 hours and a light meal up to 6 hours preoperatively without compromising safety. Objective: To compare patient comfort, postoperative recovery outcomes, and safety between ASA-guideline fasting and traditional NPO fasting in elective surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia. Methods: An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted at Nawaz Sharif Social Security Hospital, Lahore (January–April 2025) among 130 adults (18 years), ASA physical status I–III, undergoing elective orthopedic, general, urological, or gynecological surgery under general anesthesia. Patients followed either ASA fasting (n=65) or traditional NPO-after-midnight (n=65) per institutional practice. Preoperative hunger, thirst, and anxiety were measured within 30 minutes before transfer to the operating room using 0–10 numeric rating scales. Outcomes included intraoperative aspiration, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV; 0–3 scale), and length of hospital stay. Group comparisons used independent-samples tests and exact tests as appropriate (α=0.05). Results: ASA-guideline fasting significantly reduced hunger (1.88±1.42 vs 6.85±1.76), thirst (2.23±1.63 vs 7.35±1.58), and anxiety (1.55±1.31 vs 6.03±1.84) (all p<0.001). Any PONV occurred in 12.31% vs 24.62% (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.19–0.97; p=0.042). Prolonged hospitalization (4 days) was 4.62% vs 55.38% (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.06–0.44; p<0.001). Aspiration was rare (0.0% vs 1.54%; p=0.31). Conclusion: ASA-guideline fasting was associated with markedly improved preoperative comfort, reduced PONV, and shorter hospital stay without an observed increase in aspiration, supporting adoption of ASA-aligned fasting practices for elective surgery.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Muhammad Suleman Khan, Raees Fatima, Inam Ullah, Awais Akhtar, Taimoor Riaz Ullah, Farhan Zia. Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Traditional Verses ASA in Preoperative Fasting Guidelines in Elective Surgical Patients. JHWCR [Internet]. 2026 Jan. 30 [cited 2026 Feb. 12];4(2):e1226. Available from: https://jhwcr.com/index.php/jhwcr/article/view/1226

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>