Ultrasonographic Assessment of Obesity-Induced Alterations in Knee Cartilage Thickness

Main Article Content

Bisma Shahid
Shahzad Muzammil
Muhammad Naveed Babur

Abstract

Background: Obesity is an established risk factor for knee osteoarthritis through mechanical loading and metabolic-inflammatory pathways. Ultrasonography provides a non-invasive method for measuring accessible femoral articular cartilage. Objective: To assess knee cartilage thickness ultrasonographically and examine its relationship with body mass index (BMI). Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed 89 adults aged 18–65 years. Knee cartilage was evaluated using a GE Voluson 730 Expert ultrasound system with a 6–12-MHz linear probe. Femoral cartilage measurements were obtained at medial, lateral, and intercondylar regions. BMI-related differences were examined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and continuous relationships with BMI were assessed using Pearson correlation. Results: Women comprised 64/89 participants (71.9%). Mean cartilage thickness ranged from 1.57±0.48 mm at the right lateral femoral condyle to 1.88±1.38 mm at the left intercondylar area. No measured site differed significantly across BMI categories: left medial condyle p=.085, left lateral p=.185, left intercondylar p=.849, right medial p=.373, and right lateral p=.065. Continuous BMI nevertheless showed a small inverse association with right lateral femoral-condyle thickness (r=−0.265, p=.012; 95% CI −0.449 to −0.060). Conclusion: Generalized BMI-related cartilage thinning was not demonstrated. A limited inverse association was identified between BMI and right lateral femoral cartilage thickness, supporting further investigation in larger, standardized longitudinal studies.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Shahid, B. et al. 2026. Ultrasonographic Assessment of Obesity-Induced Alterations in Knee Cartilage Thickness. Journal of Health, Wellness and Community Research. 4, 2 (Jan. 2026), 1–7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.61919/tpyk4247.

References

1. Dong Y, Yan Y, Zhou J, Zhou Q, Wei H. Evidence on risk factors for knee osteoarthritis in middle-older aged: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1):634. doi:10.1186/s13018-023-04089-6.

2. Sampath SJP, Venkatesan V, Ghosh S, Kotikalapudi N. Obesity, metabolic syndrome, and osteoarthritis—an updated review. Curr Obes Rep. 2023;12(3):308–331. doi:10.1007/s13679-023-00520-5.

3. Moyer R, Wirth W, Eckstein F. Longitudinal changes in magnetic resonance imaging-based measures of femorotibial cartilage thickness as a function of alignment and obesity: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Arthritis Care Res. 2017;69(7):959–965. doi:10.1002/acr.23096.

4. Di Martino A, Barile F, D’Agostino C, Castafaro V, Cerasoli T, Mora P, et al. Are there gender-specific differences in hip and knee cartilage composition and degeneration? A systematic literature review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024;34(4):1901–1910. doi:10.1007/s00590-024-03871-4.

5. Naredo E, Acebes C, Möller I, Canillas F, de Agustín JJ, de Miguel E, et al. Ultrasound validity in the measurement of knee cartilage thickness. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(8):1322–1327. doi:10.1136/ard.2008.090738.

6. Schmitz RJ, Wang HM, Polprasert DR, Kraft RA, Pietrosimone BG. Evaluation of knee cartilage thickness: a comparison between ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging methods. Knee. 2017;24(2):217–223. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2016.10.004.

7. Battersby HS, Evans RJ, Eghobamien IJ, Pamukoff DN. Measurement position influences sex comparisons of distal femoral cartilage thickness with ultrasound imaging. J Appl Biomech. 2024;40(4):333–345. doi:10.1123/jab.2024-0006.

8. Vomer RP, Boggess SB, Boggess B. Ultrasound evaluation of knee osteoarthritis. Cureus. 2023;15(5). doi:10.7759/cureus.39188.

9. Minea M, Lupu AA, Nurla G, Minea AE, Vlădăreanu L, Ciortea VM, et al. Musculoskeletal ultrasound reliability in knee osteoarthritis: a pilot study of cartilage thickness, osteophytes and weight-bearing meniscal extrusion. Medicina (Kaunas). 2026;62(7):1292. doi:10.3390/medicina62071292.

10. Royston P, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W. Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea. Stat Med. 2006;25(1):127–141. doi:10.1002/sim.2331.

11. Gersing AS, Schwaiger BJ, Nevitt MC, Joseph GB, Chanchek N, Guimarães JB, et al. Is weight loss associated with less progression of changes in knee articular cartilage among obese and overweight patients as assessed with MR imaging over 48 months? Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Radiology. 2017;284(2):508–520. doi:10.1148/radiol.2017161005.

12. Gersing AS, Schwaiger BJ, Nevitt MC, Zarnowski J, Joseph GB, Feuerriegel G, et al. Weight loss regimen in obese and overweight individuals is associated with reduced cartilage degeneration: 96-month data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019;27(6):863–870. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2019.01.018.