Prevalence of Balance Impairment in University Students With Smartphone Associated Subclinical Neck Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study

Main Article Content

Anisa Naz
Khadija Usman
Okasha Anjum

Abstract

Background: Prolonged smartphone use among university students may coexist with cervical symptoms and altered postural control. Objective: To determine the prevalence and distribution of balance impairment among university students with smartphone-associated subclinical neck pain and examine associations of balance status with neck pain and smartphone addiction. Methods: This analytical cross-sectional study included 87 university students aged 18–25 years recruited by convenience sampling at Indus University, Karachi, Pakistan. Static balance was assessed using the Balance Error Scoring System, neck-related disability using the Neck Disability Index, pain intensity using a visual analogue scale, and smartphone-related behaviour using a smartphone addiction questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used for analysis. Results: Moderate balance impairment was the predominant BESS category, affecting 63 participants (72.4%), while 15 (17.2%) had mild impairment, one (1.1%) had severe impairment, and eight (9.2%) had normal balance. Moderate neck disability was present in 58 participants (66.7%), moderate pain in 38 (43.7%), and moderate-risk smartphone addiction in 61 (70.1%). Balance status was associated with sex (p=0.009), age group (p=0.028), smartphone addiction level (p=0.021), and neck-pain severity (p=0.001). Conclusion: Balance abnormalities frequently coexisted with neck-related symptoms and problematic smartphone-use behaviour in this university sample

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Anisa Naz et al. 2026. Prevalence of Balance Impairment in University Students With Smartphone Associated Subclinical Neck Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Health, Wellness and Community Research. 4, 6 (Mar. 2026), 1–7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.61919/xbvf6951.

References

1. Ratan ZA, Parrish AM, Zaman SB, Alotaibi MS, Hosseinzadeh H. Smartphone addiction and associated health outcomes in adult populations: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(22):12257.

2. Alhurishi SA. The relationship between physical activity and smartphone usage among university students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J High Inst Public Health. 2023;53(3):90-95.

3. Wang D, Xiang Z, Fesenmaier DR. Adapting to the mobile world: a model of smartphone use. Ann Tour Res. 2014;48:11-26.

4. Zhang J, Zeng Y. Effect of college students’ smartphone addiction on academic achievement: the mediating role of academic anxiety and moderating role of sense of academic control. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024:933-944.

5. Demir OB, Bilgin A, Yilmaz FT. Smartphone addiction among elderly individuals: its relationship with physical activity, activities of daily living, and balance levels. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):965.

6. Zheng DD, Li D, Cheng JX, Jin RH. The prevalence of neck pain among online learning students: an observational study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103(32).

7. Sidiq M, Ramachandran A, Kashoo F, Yadav M, Shaphe M, Ahluwalia G, et al. Prevalence of chronic nonspecific neck pain and its associated risk factors among adults in Mathura, India. NeuroQuantology. 2022;20(10):3210-3219.

8. Safiri S, Kolahi AA, Hoy D, Buchbinder R, Mansournia MA, Bettampadi D, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of neck pain in the general population, 1990-2017: systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. BMJ. 2020;368.

9. Rosa DK, Rosa MA, Padula RS. Factors associated with nonspecific neck pain incidence in industrial workers: a systematic review. Int J Ind Ergon. 2024;101:103596.

10. Emedoli D, Alemanno F, Iannaccone S, Houdayer E, Castellazzi P, Zangrillo F, et al. Sensory-motor training with virtual reality as a complementary intervention to manual therapy for persistent non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024;60(4):680.

11. Chan LL, Wong AY, Wang MH, Cheung K, Samartzis D. The prevalence of neck pain and associated risk factors among undergraduate students: a large-scale cross-sectional study. Int J Ind Ergon. 2020;76:102934.

12. Almeida MB, Moreira M, Moreira J, Vaz JR, Moleirinho-Alves P, Oliveira R. The time-course changes in postural control variability between neck pain and asymptomatic dental students. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):31004.

13. Kragting M, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Coppieters MW, O’Sullivan PB, Voogt L. Illness perceptions in people with chronic and disabling non-specific neck pain seeking primary healthcare: a qualitative study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024;25(1):179.

14. Keller M, Lichtenstein E, Roth R, Faude O. Balance training under fatigue: a randomized controlled trial on the effect of fatigue on adaptations to balance training. J Strength Cond Res. 2024;38(2):297-305.

15. Todri J, Gjini E, Lena O. Assessment properties of the Visual Analogue Scale, Numeric Rating Scale, Face Pain Scale, and Pain Intensity Subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory in Albanian population with low back pain. Ann Med. 2025;57(1):2601406.

16. Paulus I, Brumagne S. Altered interpretation of neck proprioceptive signals in persons with subclinical recurrent neck pain. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(6):426-432.

17. Wah SW, Puntumetakul R, Boucaut R. Effects of proprioceptive and craniocervical flexor training on static balance in university student smartphone users with balance impairment: a randomized controlled trial. J Pain Res. 2021;14:1935-1947.

18. Wah SW, Chatchawan U, Chatprem T, Puntumetakul R. Prevalence of static balance impairment and associated factors of university student smartphone users with subclinical neck pain: cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(17):10723.

19. Landage G, Pathan UI. Comparison of dynamic soft tissue mobilization and myofascial release for mechanical neck pain. Cuest Fisioter. 2025;54(4):5027-5045.

20. Bielewicz J, Daniluk B, Kamieniak P. VAS and NRS, same or different? Are visual analog scale values and numerical rating scale equally viable tools for assessing patients after microdiscectomy? Pain Res Manag. 2022;2022:5337483.