Early Colchicine Therapy Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Reduce Peri-Stent Inflammation and In-Stent Restenosis : A Randomized Controlled Trial

Main Article Content

Muzayyian Fatima
Ali Umair Tariq
Nargis Hanif
Muhammad Mudassar
Zainab Amer
Akif Saeed Ch
Asra Javed

Abstract

Background: Vascular injury during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) triggers an inflammatory response that may contribute to neointimal proliferation and early luminal narrowing despite drug-eluting stent use. Objective: To evaluate whether early low-dose colchicine added to standard post-PCI therapy reduces inflammatory biomarkers and improves short-term angiographic outcomes compared with standard therapy alone. Methods: This prospective, single-center, parallel-group randomized controlled trial enrolled 80 adults aged 35–70 years undergoing successful PCI with drug-eluting stent implantation. Participants were randomized 1:1 to colchicine 0.5 mg once daily plus standard care or standard care alone for 6 weeks. hs-CRP and IL-6 were measured at baseline and 6 weeks, while minimal lumen diameter and in-stent luminal narrowing were assessed by quantitative coronary angiography. Complete follow-up data were available for 75 participants. Between-group comparisons, repeated-measures analysis of variance, and Pearson correlation were used. Results: At 6 weeks, hs-CRP was lower with colchicine than control (1.64±0.42 vs 3.12±0.65 mg/L; mean difference −1.48, 95% CI −1.73 to −1.23; p<0.001), as was IL-6 (3.18±0.82 vs 5.62±1.10 pg/mL; mean difference −2.44, 95% CI −2.89 to −1.99; p<0.001). Minimal lumen diameter was larger (2.68±0.31 vs 2.41±0.35 mm; p<0.001), and in-stent luminal narrowing was lower (12.4±3.8% vs 20.2±5.1%; p<0.001). Conclusion: Early colchicine initiation was associated with greater short-term reductions in inflammatory biomarkers and more favorable 6-week angiographic measurements after PCI, although longer-term clinical benefit cannot be established from these data

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Muzayyian Fatima et al. 2026. Early Colchicine Therapy Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Reduce Peri-Stent Inflammation and In-Stent Restenosis : A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Health, Wellness and Community Research. 4, 5 (Mar. 2026), 1–7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.61919/dv8awe40.

References

1. Ochijewicz D, Tomaniak M, Opolski G, Kochman J. Inflammation as a determinant of healing response after coronary stent implantation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;37(3):791-801. doi:10.1007/s10554-020-02073-3.

2. Mourouzis K, Oikonomou E, Siasos G, Tsalamadris S, Vogiatzi G, Antonopoulos A, et al. Pro-inflammatory cytokines in acute coronary syndromes. Curr Pharm Des. 2020;26(36):4624-4647. doi:10.2174/1381612826666200413082353.

3. Barungi S, Hernández-Camarero P, Moreno-Terribas G, Villalba-Montoro R, Marchal JA, López-Ruiz E, et al. Clinical implications of inflammation in atheroma formation and novel therapies in cardiovascular diseases. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023;11:1148768. doi:10.3389/fcell.2023.1148768.

4. Gori T. Restenosis after coronary stent implantation: cellular mechanisms and potential of endothelial progenitor cells (a short guide for the interventional cardiologist). Cells. 2022;11(13):2094. doi:10.3390/cells11132094.

5. Liu Y, Lu K, Zhang R, Hu D, Yang Z, Zeng J, et al. Advancements in the treatment of atherosclerosis: from conventional therapies to cutting-edge innovations. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2024;7(12):3804-3826. doi:10.1021/acsptsci.4c00574.

6. Yu M, Dai C, Shi J, Fu J. Immune modulation strategies to reduce in-stent restenosis. Biomater Sci. 2025;13(18):4898-4915. doi:10.1039/D5BM00687B.

7. Pelliccia F, Zimarino M, Niccoli G, Morrone D, De Luca G, Miraldi F, et al. In-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: emerging knowledge on biological pathways. Eur Heart J Open. 2023;3(5). doi:10.1093/ehjopen/oead083.

8. Pepe M, Napoli G, Carulli E, Moscarelli M, Forleo C, Nestola PL, et al. Autoimmune diseases in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a risk factor for in-stent restenosis? Atherosclerosis. 2021;333:24-31. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.08.007.

9. Wang K, Yin Z, Zhang Y, Wu X, Fan L. From bench to clinic: advances in anti-inflammatory therapies for atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. FASEB J. 2025;39(18). doi:10.1096/fj.202502269R.

10. Al Noman A, Sejuti SR, Anuva NJ, Nabin MNR, Noman MJI, Islam MH, et al. Advances in anti-inflammatory therapies for cardiovascular disease and atherosclerosis. Curr Signal Transduct Ther. 2025;20(3). doi:10.2174/0115743624366056250407071501.

11. Pacinella G, Ciaccio AM, Tuttolomondo A. Endothelial dysfunction and chronic inflammation: the cornerstones of vascular alterations in age-related diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(24):15722. doi:10.3390/ijms232415722.

12. Brie DM, Mornoș C, Adam O, Tîrziu A, Popescu R, Brie AD. Inflammatory mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes: from pathophysiology to therapeutic targets. Cells. 2025;15(1):72. doi:10.3390/cells15010072.

13. Cozac DA, Halațiu VB, Scridon A. The alarmin tandem: unraveling the complex effect of S100A8/A9—from atherosclerosis to cardiac arrhythmias. Front Immunol. 2025;16:1630410. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1630410.

14. Engelen SE, Robinson AJB, Zurke YX, Monaco C. Therapeutic strategies targeting inflammation and immunity in atherosclerosis: how to proceed? Nat Rev Cardiol. 2022;19(8):522-542. doi:10.1038/s41569-021-00668-4.