Preoperative Diffusion Tensor Imaging Guided Surgical Planning Versus Standard MRI for Reducing Iatrogenic Nerve Injury in Spinal Fusion Surgery

Main Article Content

Mudassir Jan
Younis Ibrahim
Sidra Khan
Faisal Shahzad
Soban Haseeb
Hira Javed

Abstract

Background: Iatrogenic neurological injury remains an important complication of complex lumbar and lumbosacral spinal fusion. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides detailed anatomical information but limited characterization of the microstructural organization and trajectories of compressed or displaced nerve fibers. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) may provide additional patient-specific information for surgical planning. Objective: To evaluate whether preoperative DTI-guided surgical planning reduces postoperative neurological deficits and improves early clinical outcomes compared with standard MRI-based planning. Methods: This prospective parallel-group randomized controlled trial included 92 adults undergoing elective multilevel lumbar or lumbosacral spinal fusion. Participants were randomized 1:1 to DTI-guided planning (n=46) or standard MRI planning (n=46). Four participants were lost to six-week follow-up, leaving 44 participants per group for postoperative analysis. Outcomes included neurological deficits, Medical Research Council (MRC) motor scores, sensory recovery, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Results: Neurological deficits occurred in 1/44 participants (2.3%) in the DTI group and 8/44 (18.2%) in the standard MRI group, corresponding to a risk difference of −15.9 percentage points (95% CI −28.1 to −3.7), relative risk 0.13 (95% CI 0.02–0.96), and p=0.030. Mean postoperative MRC scores were 4.82±0.39 and 4.38±0.65, respectively (mean difference 0.44; 95% CI 0.21–0.67; p<0.001). At six weeks, VAS pain was 15.2 mm lower and ODI 11.8 percentage points lower in the DTI group. Conclusion: DTI-guided planning was associated with fewer short-term neurological deficits and greater early functional recovery than standard MRI planning

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Mudassir Jan et al. 2026. Preoperative Diffusion Tensor Imaging Guided Surgical Planning Versus Standard MRI for Reducing Iatrogenic Nerve Injury in Spinal Fusion Surgery. Journal of Health, Wellness and Community Research. 4, 2 (Jan. 2026), 1–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.61919/eeq4qd23.

References

1. Fujii T, Kumar R, Cha J, Bansal A, de Oliveira RG, Louie PK, et al. Neurological complications following anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF): a systematic review. Global Spine J. 2025. doi:10.1177/21925682251349173.

2. Alvi MA, Kwon BK, Hejrati N, Tetreault LA, Evaniew N, Skelly AC, et al. Accuracy of intraoperative neuromonitoring in the diagnosis of intraoperative neurological decline in the setting of spinal surgery—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Global Spine J. 2024. doi:10.1177/21925682231196514.

3. Scullen TA, Milburn J, Aria KM, Mathkour M, Tubbs RS, Kalyvas J. The use of diffusion tensor imaging in spinal pathology: a comprehensive literature review. Eur Spine J. 2024. doi:10.1007/s00586-024-08231-8.

4. Pesesse P, Vanderthommen M, Durieux N, Zubkov M, Demoulin C. Clinical value and reliability of quantitative assessments of lumbosacral nerve root using diffusion tensor and diffusion weighted MR imaging: a systematic review. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024. doi:10.1002/jmri.29213.

5. Wang N, Sun D, Zhang XY, Xi Z, Li J, Xie L. Nerve abnormalities in lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diffusion tensor imaging. PLoS One. 2022;17(12):e0279499. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0279499.

6. Cheng H, Lan H, Bao Y, Yin L. Application of magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging in diagnosis of lumbosacral nerve root compression. Curr Med Imaging. 2023. doi:10.2174/1573405620666230612122725.

7. Singh R, Khare N, Aggarwal S, Jain M, Kaur S, Singh HD. A prospective study to evaluate the clinical and diffusion tensor imaging correlation in patients with lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2023. doi:10.22603/ssrr.2022-0159.

8. Bruno F, Marrelli A, Tommasino E, Martinese G, Gagliardi A, Pertici L, et al. Advanced MRI imaging of nerve roots in lumbar radiculopathy due to discoradicular conflict: DWI, DTI, and T2 mapping with clinical and neurophysiological correlations. Radiol Med. 2022. doi:10.1007/s11547-022-01550-0.

9. Ibrahim I, Škoch A, Herynek V, Jiru F, Tintěra J. Magnetic resonance tractography of the lumbosacral plexus. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100:e24646. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000024646.

10. Shi Y, Zhao F, Dou W, Ding H, Zou YF, Feng Y, et al. Quantitative evaluation of intraspinal lumbar disc herniation-related lumbosacral radiculopathy before and after percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy using diffusion tensor imaging. Spine. 2021. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000003925.

11. Wu P, Huang C, Zhao S, Jin A, Shi B. Preoperative quantitative diffusion tensor imaging on the spinal nerve root is a predictor for the surgical outcome of lumbar disc herniation: a prospective study of 117 patients. J Neurosurg Sci. 2021. doi:10.23736/S0390-5616.21.05441-2.

12. Korkmazer B, Kemerdere R, Bas G, Arslan S, Demir B, Batkitar A, et al. The efficacy of preoperative diffusion tensor tractography on surgical planning and outcomes in patients with intramedullary spinal tumor. Eur Spine J. 2023. doi:10.1007/s00586-023-07872-5.

13. An J, Chen J, Wu H, Zhao J, Zhang W. A retrospective case-control study on the effectiveness of preoperative diffusion tensor imaging for mitigating nerve injury in extreme lateral interbody fusion surgery. Spine J. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2024.06.017.

14. Lian Z, Gao S, Yu X, Zhang H. Analysis of the curative effect of diffusion tensor imaging-guided percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Curr Med Imaging. 2023. doi:10.2174/1573405619666230206113414.

15. Tabarestani TQ, Sykes D, Maquoit G, Wang TY, Ayoub C, Shaffrey C, et al. Novel merging of CT and MRI to allow for safe navigation into Kambin's triangle for percutaneous lumbar interbody fusion—initial case series investigating safety and efficacy. Oper Neurosurg. 2023. doi:10.1227/ons.0000000000000531.

16. Shuman WH, Valliani AA, Chapman E, Martini ML, Neifert SN, Baron RB, et al. Intraoperative navigation in spine surgery: effects on complications and reoperations. World Neurosurg. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2022.01.035.

17. Masumoto R, Eguchi Y, Takeuchi H, Inage K, Narita M, Shiga Y, et al. Automatic generation of diffusion tensor imaging for the lumbar nerve using convolutional neural networks. Magn Reson Imaging. 2024;110237. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2024.110237.

18. Paternostro-Sluga T, Grim-Stieger M, Posch M, Schuhfried O, Vacariu G, Mittermaier C, et al. Reliability and validity of the Medical Research Council scale and a modified scale for testing muscle strength in patients with radial palsy. J Rehabil Med. 2008. doi:10.2340/16501977-0235.

19. Koivunen K, Widbom-Kolhanen S, Pernaa K, Arokoski J, Saltychev M. Reliability and validity of Oswestry Disability Index among patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery. BMC Surg. 2024. doi:10.1186/s12893-023-02307-w.

20. Dodo Y, Okano I, Zelenty WD, Paek S, Sarin M, Haffer H, et al. The utilization of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for lumbar decompression and fusion surgery in New York State. Spine. 2023. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000004603.

21. Alluri R, Mok J, Vaishnav AS, Shelby T, Sivaganesan A, Hah RJ, et al. Intraoperative neuromonitoring during lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Neurospine. 2021. doi:10.14245/ns.2142440.220.

22. Mundis GM, Record N, Shah B, Lakomkin N, Carnelian A, Brady KC, et al. Incidence of postoperative neurological deficit with the use of an intraoperative neuromonitoring protocol for lateral lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2023. doi:10.3171/2023.9.SPINE23263.

23. Haakma W, Hendrikse J, Uhrenholt L, Leemans A, Boel LWT, Pedersen M, et al. Multicenter reproducibility study of diffusion MRI and fiber tractography of the lumbosacral nerves. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;48(4):951-963. doi:10.1002/jmri.25964.

24. Yoon NY, Ha D, Lee SM, Choi HJ. Diffusion-weighted MR neurography with unidirectional motion-probing gradient to evaluate lumbar nerve roots at 1.5T MR. J Korean Soc Radiol. 2024. doi:10.3348/jksr.2023.0052.

25. Monti L, Bellini M, Alberti M, Piane E, Casseri T, Sadotti G, et al. Longitudinal DTI analysis of microstructural changes in lumbar nerve roots following interspinous process device placement. Magn Reson Imaging. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2024.110306.