Effect of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Training Combined with Rotator Cuff Exercise on Pain, Strength, and Function in Adults with Rotator Cuff-Related Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Main Article Content

Ayesha Khan
Syed Aqil Hussain Shah
Sadia Bashir
Rida Zia Chaudhary
Samra Javed
Aleesha Riaz
Shahzad Ahmad

Abstract

Background: Low-load blood flow restriction (BFR) training may provide a strengthening stimulus while limiting external mechanical loading, but its incremental clinical value for rotator cuff-related shoulder pain remains uncertain. Objective: To model whether adding BFR to standardized low-load rotator cuff exercise produces superior changes in shoulder disability, pain, and rotational strength compared with the same exercise programme without BFR. Methods: A-two-arm randomized trial model included 54 participant profiles allocated equally to BFR plus exercise or conventional low-load exercise. The modeled intervention comprised three supervised sessions weekly for 6 weeks, with outcomes assessed at baseline, week 3, week 6, and week 18. SPADI was the primary outcome; NPRS and external- and internal-rotation strength were secondary outcomes. Longitudinal mixed-effects models constituted the primary analytical framework, supplemented by baseline-adjusted sensitivity models and week-6 ANCOVA. Results: Both groups demonstrated substantial modeled improvement in SPADI. The prespecified SPADI group-by-time interaction was not statistically significant (χ²(3)=7.553, P=0.056), and the baseline-adjusted week-6 difference was 0.04 points (95% CI −1.58 to 1.65; P=0.963). Adjusted NPRS favored conventional exercise by 0.54 points at week 6 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.76; P<0.001). External-rotation strength showed no significant adjusted between-group difference, whereas the week-6 internal-rotation contrast favored BFR by 3.07 N (95% CI 1.03 to 5.11; P=0.004), despite a nonsignificant adjusted longitudinal interaction. Conclusion: This did not demonstrate a clinically meaningful incremental BFR benefit for shoulder disability. Conventional exercise produced a modest pain advantage, while the internal-rotation strength signal remained exploratory and requires confirmation in adequately powered prospective trials

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Ayesha Khan et al. 2026. Effect of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Training Combined with Rotator Cuff Exercise on Pain, Strength, and Function in Adults with Rotator Cuff-Related Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Health, Wellness and Community Research. 4, 2 (Jan. 2026), 1–17. DOI:https://doi.org/10.61919/6y95q554.

References

1. Desmeules F, Roy J-S, Lafrance S, Charron M, Dubé M-O, Dupuis F, et al. Rotator cuff tendinopathy diagnosis, nonsurgical medical care, and rehabilitation: a clinical practice guideline. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2025;55(4):235-274.

2. Powell JK, Lewis JS. Rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: is it time to reframe the advice, “You need to strengthen your shoulder”? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2021;51(4):156-158.

3. Lafrance S, Charron M, Dubé M-O, Desmeules F, Roy J-S, Juul-Kristensen B, et al. The efficacy of exercise therapy for rotator cuff-related shoulder pain according to the FITT principle: a systematic review with meta-analyses. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2024;54(8):499-512.

4. Dominguez-Romero JG, Jimenez-Rejano JJ, Ridao-Fernandez C, Chamorro-Moriana G. Exercise-based muscle development programmes and their effectiveness in the functional recovery of rotator cuff tendinopathy: a systematic review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(3):529.

5. de-Queiroz JHM, de-Medeiros MB, de-Lima RN, de Queiroz Cerdeira D. Exercise for rotator cuff tendinopathy. Rev Bras Med Trab. 2023;20(3):498.

6. Malliaras P, Johnston R, Street G, Littlewood C, Bennell K, Haines T, et al. The efficacy of higher versus lower dose exercise in rotator cuff tendinopathy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;101(10):1822-1834.

7. Cognetti DJ, Sheean AJ, Owens JG. Blood flow restriction therapy and its use for rehabilitation and return to sport: physiology, application, and guidelines for implementation. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022;4(1):e71-e76.

8. Kara D, Ozcakar L, Demirci S, Huri G, Duzgun I. Blood flow restriction training in patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy: a randomized, assessor-blinded, controlled trial. Clin J Sport Med. 2024;34(1):10-16.

9. Brumitt J, Hutchison MK, Kang D, Klemmer Z, Stroud M, Cheng E, et al. Blood flow restriction training for the rotator cuff: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2020;15(8):1175-1180.

10. Hamedi H, Gholipour MA, Seyedhoseinpoor T. Enhancing shoulder strength through blood flow restriction training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2025;17(1):372.

11. Jing J, Zheng Q, Dong H, Wang Y, Wang P, Fan D, et al. Effects of upper extremity blood flow restriction training on muscle strength and hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Physiol. 2025;15:1488305.

12. Zhang B, Raguzzi IA, Dupuis F, Gianola S, Morgan-Daniel J, Roy J-S, et al. Addressing shoulder weakness in individuals with rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2026;56(2):67-84.

13. Young I, Dunning J, Escaloni J, Maselli F, Prall J, Mourad F, et al. Reliability, construct validity, responsiveness and minimum clinically important difference of the numeric pain rating scale and shoulder pain and disability index in patients with subacromial pain syndrome. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2025;79:103372.

14. Salvatore G, Longo UG, De Salvatore S, Candela V, Piergentili I, Bandini B, et al. Evaluating shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) outcomes post-rotator cuff repair: minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) analysis. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2025;38(5):974-980.

15. Hopewell S, Chan A-W, Collins GS, Hróbjartsson A, Moher D, Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials. Lancet. 2025;405(10489):1633-1640.

16. Hopewell S, Chan A-W, Collins GS, Hróbjartsson A, Moher D, Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials. BMJ. 2025;389.

17. Raulline Ullern K, Richardsen M, Weerasekara I, Bogen BE. Painful considerations in exercise-management for rotator cuff related shoulder pain: a scoping review on pain-related prescription parameters. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025;26(1):180.

18. Chamorro C, Arancibia M, Trigo B, Arias-Poblete L, Jerez-Mayorga D. Absolute reliability and concurrent validity of hand-held dynamometry in shoulder rotator strength assessment: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(17):9293.

19. Chen B, Liu L, Chen LB, Cao X, Han P, Wang C, et al. Concurrent validity and reliability of a handheld dynamometer in measuring isometric shoulder rotational strength. J Sport Rehabil. 2021;30(6):965-968.

20. Couch J, Sayers M, Pizzari T. Reliability of the ForceFrame with and without a fixed upper-limb mold in shoulder rotation strength assessments compared with traditional hand-held dynamometry. J Sport Rehabil. 2021;30(8):1246-1249.

21. Anderson KD, Rask DM, Bates TJ, Nuelle JA. Overall safety and risks associated with blood flow restriction therapy: a literature review. Mil Med. 2022;187(9-10):1059-1064.