Smartphone Video-Based Cervical Range of Motion Assessment in Pediatric Torticollis: A Validity and Reliability Study
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Accurate cervical range-of-motion assessment is important for diagnosing torticollis, planning rehabilitation, and monitoring clinical change. Smartphone video analysis may provide an accessible alternative to conventional measurement, but its measurement properties require evaluation. Objective: To determine the concurrent validity, intra-rater reliability, inter-rater reliability, and measurement error of smartphone video-based cervical range-of-motion assessment in children with torticollis. Methods: This cross-sectional measurement-property study included 30 children aged 6 months to 5 years with congenital or acquired torticollis. Cervical rotation, lateral flexion, flexion, and extension were assessed using smartphone-recorded video analysis and conventional goniometry. Pearson correlation coefficients evaluated associations between methods. Two assessors analysed the recordings for inter-rater reliability, and one assessor repeated the analysis after one week for intra-rater reliability. Intraclass correlation coefficients, standard errors of measurement, and 95% minimal detectable changes were calculated. Results: Smartphone measurements were 0.7°–0.8° lower than goniometric measurements, with no reported significant differences between methods. Correlations ranged from 0.88 to 0.95 (all p<0.001). Intra-rater ICCs ranged from 0.92 to 0.96 and inter-rater ICCs from 0.90 to 0.94. SEM values ranged from 2.1° to 2.5°, and MDC95 values ranged from 5.8° to 6.9°. Conclusion: Smartphone video analysis demonstrated strong associations with goniometry and high reliability for repeated analysis of stored recordings, although formal agreement analysis remains necessary before clinical interchangeability can be assumed
Article Details
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
1. Bruyneel A. Smartphone Applications for Range of Motion Measurement in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review. Medical Informatics Europe. 2020.
2. Ghorbani F, Kamyab M, Azadinia F. Smartphone Applications as a Suitable Alternative to CROM Device and Inclinometers in Assessing the Cervical Range of Motion in Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain. Journal Chiropractic Medicine. 2020.
3. Guidetti L, Placentino U, Baldari C. Reliability and Criterion Validity of the Smartphone Inclinometer Application to Quantify Cervical Spine Mobility. Clinical Spine Surgery: A Spine Publication. 2017;30(10):E1359-E66.
4. Keogh J, Cox A, Anderson SL, Liew B, Olsen A, Schram B, et al. Reliability and validity of clinically accessible smartphone applications to measure joint range of motion: A systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2019.
5. Khan A, Aafreen, Khan A, Ahmed H, Shaphe M, Qasheesh M. Test–retest reliability and validity of cervical range of motion measurement using a smartphone clinometer and compass application among individuals with and without neck pain. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation. 2023.
6. Kortam S, Hussein ZA, Refaat S. Uses of Smart Phones Application on Physical Therapy for Pediatric Evaluation: Systematic Review. 2020.
7. Molaei F, Tabatabaei A, Azizi S, Asgari S, Pezeshk AF, Sharma NK. Concurrent Validity and Reliability of a New Smartphone Application for Measuring Cervical Range of Motion in Healthy Individuals. Journal of Allied Health. 2024.
8. Nuhmani S, Khan M, Kachanathu S, Bari MA, Abualait T, Muaidi Q. Reliability and validity of smartphone applications to measure the spinal range of motion: A systematic review. Expert Review of Medical Devices. 2021.
9. Palsson T, Christensen S, Thomsen MH, Hirata R. Assessment of range and quality of neck movement using a smartphone-based application. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice. 2019.
10. Pourahmadi MR, Bagheri R, Taghipour M, Takamjani IE, Sarrafzadeh J, Mohseni-Bandpei MA. A new iPhone application for measuring active craniocervical range of motion in patients with non-specific neck pain: a reliability and validity study. The Spine Journal. 2018;18(3):447-57.
11. Quek J, Brauer S, Treleaven J, Pua Y, Mentiplay B, Clark R. Validity and intra-rater reliability of an Android phone application to measure cervical range-of-motion. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2014.
12. Rodríguez-Sanz J, Carrasco-Uribarren A, Cabanillas-Barea S, Hidalgo-García C, Fanlo-Mazas P, Lucha-López MO, et al. Validity and reliability of two Smartphone applications to measure the lower and upper cervical spine range of motion in subjects with chronic cervical pain. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. 2019.
13. Romero-Franco N, Oliva-Pascual-Vaca Á, Fernández-Domínguez JC. Concurrent validity and reliability of a smartphone-based application for the head repositioning and cervical range of motion. Biomedizinische Technik Biomedical engineering. 2022.
14. Seager A, French H, Meldrum D. Measurement properties of instruments for assessment of cervical spine function in infants with torticollis: a systematic review. Eur J Pediatr. 2019;178(5):657-71.
15. Sedrez JA, Furlanetto TS, Gelain GM, Candotti C. Validity and Reliability of Smartphones in Assessing Spinal Kinematics: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 2020.
16. Song SH, Park JS, Song KY, Baek KH, Yoo SH, Kim JS. A Study on the Validity and Test-retest Reliability of the Measurement of the Head Tilt Angle of the Smart Phone Application ‘KPIMT Torticollis Protractor’. The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy. 2023.
17. Stenneberg MS, Busstra H, Eskes M, Trijffel Ev, Cattrysse E, Scholten-Peeters G, et al. Concurrent validity and interrater reliability of a new smartphone application to assess 3D active cervical range of motion in patients with neck pain. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice. 2018.
18. Tousignant‐Laflamme Y, Boutin N, Dion AM, Vallée C. Reliability and criterion validity of two applications of the iPhone™ to measure cervical range of motion in healthy participants. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2013.
19. Ullucci P, Tudini F, Moran M. Reliability of Smartphone Inclinometry to Measure Upper Cervical Range of Motion. Journal of sport rehabilitation. 2019.
20. Vohralik SL, Bowen A, Burns J, Hiller C, Nightingale E. Reliability and Validity of a Smartphone App to Measure Joint Range. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2015.