Evaluation of Hemodynamic Changes in Portal Hypertension and Their Correlation with Splenomegaly Using Doppler Ultrasonography

Main Article Content

Isha Aftab
Hafiza Maria Fawad
Tayyaba Iqbal
Rabail Asif
Mehak Fatima
Mahnoor Zulfiqar
Noor Fatima

Abstract

Background: Portal hypertension produces structural and haemodynamic alterations in the portal and splenic circulations, frequently resulting in splenomegaly. Doppler ultrasonography enables non-invasive assessment of these changes. Objective: To evaluate associations between Doppler-derived portal haemodynamic parameters and spleen length in adults with portal hypertension and splenomegaly. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 53 adults recruited through convenience sampling from the radiology department of Al Razi Institute, Lahore. Portal vein diameter, portal vein velocity, portal flow, portal vein pulsatility index, portal vein resistance index, splenic vein flow velocity, hepatic artery resistance index, and spleen length were assessed. Pearson and Spearman correlations and multiple linear regression were performed using SPSS version 25.0. Results: Mean age was 51.83 ± 8.21 years, and 31 participants (58.5%) were male. Mean spleen length was 14.94 ± 1.37 cm. Spleen length correlated positively with portal vein diameter (r = 0.981; 95% CI: 0.967–0.989) and negatively with portal vein velocity (r = −0.978; 95% CI: −0.987 to −0.962), splenic vein velocity (r = −0.976), and portal flow (r = −0.975); all p < 0.001. The regression model explained 97.3% of variance in spleen length, although predictors were highly collinear. Portal vein diameter remained independently associated with spleen length (B = 0.509; 95% CI: 0.231–0.787; p = 0.001). Conclusion: Spleen length was strongly associated with multiple Doppler parameters, particularly portal vein diameter. These findings require cautious interpretation and independent validation because of severe multicollinearity and the small single-centre sample

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Isha Aftab, Hafiza Maria Fawad, Tayyaba Iqbal, Rabail Asif, Mehak Fatima, Mahnoor Zulfiqar, et al. Evaluation of Hemodynamic Changes in Portal Hypertension and Their Correlation with Splenomegaly Using Doppler Ultrasonography. JHWCR [Internet]. 2026 Mar. 30 [cited 2026 Jul. 27];4(6):1-9. Available from: https://jhwcr.com/index.php/jhwcr/article/view/1920

References

1. Iwakiri Y, Groszmann RJ. Pathophysiology of portal hypertension. In: The liver: biology and pathobiology. 2020. p. 659–69.

2. Bosch J, Abraldes JG, Berzigotti A, García-Pagán JC. Portal hypertension and gastrointestinal bleeding. Semin Liver Dis. 2008;28(1):3–25.

3. Laleman W, Van Landeghem L, Wilmer A, Fevery J, Nevens F. Portal hypertension: from pathophysiology to clinical practice. Liver Int. 2005;25(6):1079–90.

4. Bolognesi M, Merkel C, Sacerdoti D, Nava V, Gatta A. Role of spleen enlargement in cirrhosis with portal hypertension. Dig Liver Dis. 2002;34(2):144–50.

5. Mejias M, Garcia-Pras E, Gallego J, Mendez R, Bosch J, Fernandez M. Relevance of the mTOR signaling pathway in the pathophysiology of splenomegaly in rats with chronic portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2010;52(4):529–39.

6. Yoshida H, Shimizu T, Yoshioka M, Matsushita A, Kawano Y, Ueda J, et al. The role of the spleen in portal hypertension. J Nippon Med Sch. 2023;90(1):20–5.

7. McCormick PA, Murphy KM. Splenomegaly, hypersplenism and coagulation abnormalities in liver disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2000;14(6):1009–31.

8. Baik SK. Haemodynamic evaluation by Doppler ultrasonography in patients with portal hypertension: a review. Liver Int. 2010;30(9):1265–77.

9. Pozo AL, Godfrey EM, Bowles KM. Splenomegaly: investigation, diagnosis and management. Blood Rev. 2009;23(3):105–11.

10. Lv Y, Lau WY, Wu H, Han X, Gong X, Liu N, et al. Causes of cytopenia in hepatic cirrhosis and portal hypertensive splenomegaly. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2017;242(7):744–9.

11. Al-Busafi SA, McNabb-Baltar J, Farag A, Hilzenrat N. Clinical manifestations of portal hypertension. Int J Hepatol. 2012;2012:203794.