Virtual Reality in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation: Knowledge, Experience and Perceptions of Physiotherapists in Lahore

Main Article Content

Bushra Rooman
Dr Taimoor Hassan
Shaista ayub
Rehaam Afzal

Abstract

Background: Virtual reality (VR) is increasingly being explored as an adjunct to conventional musculoskeletal rehabilitation because of its potential to enhance therapeutic engagement and support functional rehabilitation. However, its implementation depends partly on clinicians' knowledge, practical exposure, and perceptions, and evidence regarding these factors among physiotherapists in Pakistan remains limited. Objective: To evaluate the knowledge, experience, and perceptions of physiotherapists regarding VR-based interventions in musculoskeletal rehabilitation settings in Lahore, Pakistan. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 377 physiotherapists working in musculoskeletal rehabilitation settings in Lahore using non-probability convenience sampling. A structured questionnaire assessed demographic characteristics and domains related to knowledge, experience, perceptions, and VR exposure. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 27. Continuous variables were summarized as mean ± standard deviation, categorical variables as frequencies and percentages, and chi-square tests were used to assess reported associations among knowledge, experience, and perception. Results: Participants had a mean age of 37.46 ± 6.38 years. The mean knowledge, experience, and perception scores were 12.06 ± 2.13, 11.85 ± 2.62, and 9.11 ± 2.41, respectively. Moderate knowledge was observed in 285 (75.6%) participants, while 219 (58.1%) demonstrated neutral perceptions. No statistically significant association was observed between knowledge and experience (p = 0.282) or between knowledge and perception (p = 0.716). Experience and perception were significantly associated (p = 0.024). Conclusion: Physiotherapists in Lahore demonstrated predominantly moderate knowledge and neutral perceptions regarding VR-based musculoskeletal rehabilitation, with variable practical exposure. Experience was associated with perception, whereas knowledge was not significantly associated with either experience or perception. These findings indicate a gap between awareness and practical engagement with VR that may be relevant to future professional training and implementation strategies

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Bushra Rooman et al. 2026. Virtual Reality in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation: Knowledge, Experience and Perceptions of Physiotherapists in Lahore. Journal of Health, Wellness and Community Research. 4, 2 (Jan. 2026), 1–7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.61919/crgyra04.

References

1. Greggi C, Visconti VV, Albanese M, Gasperini B, Chiavoghilefu A, Prezioso C, et al. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2024;13(13).

2. Hernández-Duarte WA. Musculoskeletal disorders, associated factors, and literature review for intervention according to gender. Rev Bras Med Trab. 2024;22(2).

3. Tabassum M, Ayub F, Tanveer K, Ramzan M, Bukhsh A, Mohammed ZM, et al. Quality-of-life assessment in musculoskeletal disorder patients, Lahore, Pakistan. Bulletin of Pioneering Researches of Medical and Clinical Science. 2023;3(1-2023):17-24.

4. Kechichian A, Lafrance S, Matifat E, Dube F, Lussier D, Benhaim P, et al. Multimodal interventions including rehabilitation exercise for older adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2022;45(1):34-49.

5. Ricke E, Dijkstra A, Bakker EW. Prognostic factors of adherence to home-based exercise therapy in patients with chronic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Sports Act Living. 2023;5:1035023.

6. Lin H-T, Li Y-I, Hu W-P, Huang C-C, Du Y-C. A scoping review of the efficacy of virtual reality and exergaming on patients of musculoskeletal system disorder. J Clin Med. 2019;8(6):791.

7. Tang P, Cao Y, Vithran DTAV, Xiao W, Wen T, Liu S, et al. The efficacy of virtual reality on the rehabilitation of musculoskeletal diseases: umbrella review. J Med Internet Res. 2025;27.

8. Zitti M, Regazzetti M, Federico S, Cieslik B, Cacciante L, Maselli F, et al. Effectiveness of virtual reality for pain management in musculoskeletal disorders across anatomical regions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Musculoskelet Care. 2025;23(1).

9. Choi T, Heo S, Choi W, Lee S. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of virtual reality-based rehabilitation therapy on reducing the degree of pain experienced by individuals with low back pain. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(4):3502.

10. Khan Z, Adil T, Oduoye MO, Khan BS, Ayyazuddin M. Assessing the knowledge, attitude and perception of extended reality (XR) technology in Pakistan's healthcare community in an era of artificial intelligence. Front Med. 2024;11.

11. Joshi G, Musale R. Awareness, knowledge and attitude about virtual reality and augmented reality in physiotherapy practice among physiotherapists. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research. 2024;6(2).

12. Felsberg DT, McGuirt JT, Ross SE, Raisbeck LD, Howard CK, Rhea CK. Clinician perspectives on virtual reality use in physical therapy practice in the United States. PLoS One. 2025;20(4).

13. Salama F, Ho J, Tehrany R, Snow P. Experience, perceived knowledge and perspectives of physiotherapists towards the use of virtual reality-based interventions in the musculoskeletal setting: a cross-sectional survey. Cureus. 2025;17(5).

14. Ghrouz A, Herbawi F, Abualkhair D, Jaber R, Dhaidel H, Salah H, et al. Awareness and perceptions of virtual reality in physiotherapy: a cross-sectional study among students and clinicians in Palestine. BMC Med Educ. 2025;25(1):152