Prognostic Values of Electrolyte Abnormalities and Cardiac Biomarkers in Acute MI and During the Convalescent Phase: A Comparative Study

Main Article Content

Muhammad Hasnain
Bushra Shaheen
Israr Ahmad
Hamza Dilawar Khan
Junaid Alam
Abdul Malik
Asad Ullah
Muhammad Noman Khan
Saddam
Bilal Musa
Qaisar Shah

Abstract

Background: Myocardial infarction is associated with myocardial necrosis and systemic biochemical disturbances that may influence clinical monitoring during acute illness and recovery. Cardiac Troponin I is an established biomarker of myocardial injury, while sodium, potassium, and chloride may provide supportive information regarding electrolyte instability during acute myocardial infarction. Objective: To compare Troponin I and selected serum electrolyte levels between the acute and convalescent phases of myocardial infarction patients. Methods: This paired comparative observational study was conducted among 100 myocardial infarction patients recruited from the cardiology wards of Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan, from December 2023 to June 2024. Troponin I, sodium, potassium, and chloride values were recorded during the acute phase and again during the convalescent phase after treatment and hospitalization. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 24, and paired-sample t-tests were applied with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Troponin I decreased from 10.8234 ng/mL during the acute phase to 0.5836 ng/mL during convalescence, representing a 94.61% relative decline (p < 0.001). Sodium increased from 133.48 mmol/L to 143.73 mmol/L, with a mean rise of 10.25 mmol/L (p < 0.001), and potassium increased from 3.6437 mmol/L to 4.3921 mmol/L, with a mean rise of 0.7484 mmol/L (p < 0.001). Chloride showed a small non-significant change from 107.183 mmol/L to 108.338 mmol/L (p = 0.447). Conclusion: Troponin I, sodium, and potassium differed significantly between acute and convalescent phases, while chloride remained stable. Sodium and potassium may support biochemical monitoring during myocardial infarction recovery but should not be interpreted as independent diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers without outcome-based validation

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Muhammad Hasnain, Bushra Shaheen, Israr Ahmad, Hamza Dilawar Khan, Junaid Alam, Abdul Malik, et al. Prognostic Values of Electrolyte Abnormalities and Cardiac Biomarkers in Acute MI and During the Convalescent Phase: A Comparative Study. JHWCR [Internet]. 2026 Jun. 7 [cited 2026 Jun. 8];4(11):1-9. Available from: https://jhwcr.com/index.php/jhwcr/article/view/1749

References

1. Qizi TJI, Farrukh S. Treatment of myocardial infarction and first aid. Sci Innov. 2022;1(D3):317-320.

2. Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, Barthelemy O, Bauersachs J, Bhatt DL, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(14):1289-1367.

3. DeFilippis AP, Chapman AR, Mills NL, De Lemos JA, Arbab-Zadeh A, Newby LK, et al. Assessment and treatment of patients with type 2 myocardial infarction and acute nonischemic myocardial injury. Circulation. 2019;140(20):1661-1678.

4. Fathima SN. An update on myocardial infarction. Curr Res Trends Med Sci Technol. 2021;1.

5. Jayaraj JC, Davatyan K, Subramanian SS, Priya J. Epidemiology of myocardial infarction. Myocardial Infarction. 2019;10.

6. Rahman N, Zakiullah, Jan A, Saeed M, Khan MA, Parveen, et al. Association of APOE (rs429358 and rs7412) and PON1 (Q192R and L55M) variants with myocardial infarction in the Pashtun ethnic population of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Genes. 2023;14(3):687.

7. Park KC, Gaze DC, Collinson PO, Marber MS. Cardiac troponins: from myocardial infarction to chronic disease. Cardiovasc Res. 2017;113(14):1708-1718.

8. Aydin S, Ugur K, Aydin S, Sahin I, Yardim M. Biomarkers in acute myocardial infarction: current perspectives. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2019;15:1-10.

9. Tiwari D, Aw TC. Optimizing the clinical use of high-sensitivity troponin assays: a review. Diagnostics. 2023;14(1):87.

10. Shrimanker I, Bhattarai S. Electrolytes. StatPearls. 2019.

11. Bers DM. Cardiac excitation-contraction coupling. Nature. 2002;415(6868):198-205.

12. Goyal A, Spertus JA, Gosch K, Venkitachalam L, Jones PG, Van den Berghe G, et al. Serum potassium levels and mortality in acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2012;307(2):157-164.

13. Macdonald JE, Struthers AD. What is the optimal serum potassium level in cardiovascular patients? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(2):155-161.

14. Mudaraddi R, Kulkarni SP, Trivedi DJ, Patil VS, Kamble PS. Association of serum electrolytes and urea levels with cardiac markers in acute myocardial infarction. Group. 2015;29:14-77.

15. Biyani S, Lodha R, Lal RZ. Study of serum electrolytes and blood urea levels with cardiac markers in acute myocardial infarction. Sch J App Med Sci. 2016;4(5B):1570-1573.