Clinical Outcomes of Neuro-Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy in Women’s Health: A Pre–Post Study

Main Article Content

Ayesha Nisar
Iqra Shaukat
Feroz khan
Maqsood Ur Rehman
Kamran Akbar
Tanzila Rashid
Shahzad Ahmad
Gulalai

Abstract

Background: Neuro-musculoskeletal disorders are common contributors to pain, restricted mobility, functional disability, and reduced independence among women. Biological factors, pregnancy-related biomechanical changes, repetitive domestic and occupational activities, poor ergonomics, and reduced physical activity may increase women’s vulnerability to persistent movement dysfunction and chronic pain. Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of a structured six-week neuro-musculoskeletal physiotherapy rehabilitation program among women with neuro-musculoskeletal disorders using pre–post assessment of pain intensity and functional disability. Methods: A quasi-experimental single-group pre–post interventional study was conducted at the Department of Physical Therapy, Mahaban Hospital, Topi, Swabi, Pakistan, from January to June 2025. Sixty women aged 20–60 years with neuro-musculoskeletal disorders received physiotherapy three sessions per week for six weeks. The intervention included therapeutic exercise, stretching, strengthening, core stabilization, neuromuscular re-education, manual therapy, postural correction, ergonomic education, functional training, and home exercise. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale, and functional disability was assessed using condition-specific disability tools. Pre- and post-intervention scores were compared using paired-sample t-tests. Results: The mean age was 38.6 ± 9.4 years. Low back pain was the most frequent condition (40.0%). Mean VAS pain score decreased from 7.1 ± 1.3 to 3.2 ± 1.1, while functional disability score improved from 58.4 ± 10.2 to 31.6 ± 8.7 after intervention (p<0.001). Functional improvement was also observed in postural control, mobility, sitting tolerance, walking endurance, and household activities. Conclusion: A structured six-week neuro-musculoskeletal physiotherapy program was associated with significant short-term improvement in pain intensity, functional disability, and daily functional performance among women with neuro-musculoskeletal disorders.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Ayesha Nisar, Iqra Shaukat, Feroz khan, Maqsood Ur Rehman, Kamran Akbar, Tanzila Rashid, et al. Clinical Outcomes of Neuro-Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy in Women’s Health: A Pre–Post Study. JHWCR [Internet]. 2026 Jun. 4 [cited 2026 Jun. 4];4(11):1-13. Available from: https://jhwcr.com/index.php/jhwcr/article/view/1665

References

1. Kisner C, Colby LA, Borstad J. Therapeutic Exercise: Foundations and Techniques. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis; 2017.

2. Fillingim RB, King CD, Ribeiro-Dasilva MC, Rahim-Williams B, Riley JL III. Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings. J Pain. 2009;10(5):447-485.

3. Vleeming A, Albert HB, Ostgaard HC, Sturesson B, Stuge B. European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(6):794-819.

4. Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abbasi M, Abbasifard M, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204-1222.

5. Hossen AA. Effectiveness of Mulligan Mobilization with Conventional Physiotherapy for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Bangladesh Health Professions Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Dhaka; 2024.

6. Szeto GP, Straker LM, O’Sullivan PB. A comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic office workers performing monotonous keyboard work—1: neck and shoulder muscle recruitment patterns. Man Ther. 2005;10(4):270-280.

7. Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain. [Reference details incomplete in source manuscript].

8. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor Control: Translating Research into Clinical Practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.

9. Brody LT, Hall CM. Therapeutic Exercise: Moving Toward Function. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2018.

10. Richardson C, Hodges P, Hides J. Therapeutic Exercise for Lumbopelvic Stabilization. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2004.

11. Coulter ID, Crawford C, Hurwitz EL, Vernon H, Khorsan R, Booth MS, et al. Manipulation and mobilization for treating chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J. 2018;18(5):866-879.

12. Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Malmivaara A, Koes BW. Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(3):CD000335.

13. O’Sullivan PB. Cognitive functional therapy. 2018. [Reference details incomplete in source manuscript].

14. Horak FB. Postural orientation and equilibrium: what do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls? Age Ageing. 2006;35 Suppl 2:ii7-ii11.

15. Akhtar MW, Karimi H, Gilani SA. Effectiveness of core stabilization exercises and routine exercise therapy in management of pain in chronic non-specific low back pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Pak J Med Sci. 2017;33(4):1002-1006.

16. Nicholas MK, Linton SJ, Watson PJ, Main CJ; “Decade of the Flags” Working Group. Early identification and management of psychological risk factors, “yellow flags,” in patients with low back pain: a reappraisal. Phys Ther. 2011;91(5):737-753.

17. Wahid E, Ullah K, Khalil S, Khan MS, Raja AJ. Immediate effect of sustained natural apophyseal glides (SNAGs) on prolapsed intervertebral disc (PIVD) in patients with low back pain: a pre-post experimental study. Insights J Health Rehabil. 2025;3(4):362-368.